Ciprofloxacine In The Treatment Of Lower Respiratory Tract Infections: A Comparative Study Against Penicillin And Chloramphenicol

A double blind, randomized, controlled study on the efficacy and safety of oral ciprofloxacin (500 mg bid.) in pneumonia as compared to the standard therapy of proc.penicillin G (600.000 U i.m. bid.) plus chioramphenicol (1 gr i.v. bid.) was done. Bacteriologic specimens were obtained by transtra¬ch...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hood Alsagaff, Dr.
Format: Monograph NonPeerReviewed
Language:English
Published: Dept. of Pulmonology, Airlangga School of Medicine 1980
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.unair.ac.id/116685/1/R%20616.200%2046%20Als%20c2.pdf
https://repository.unair.ac.id/116685/
http://lib.unair.ac.id
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universitas Airlangga
Language: English
id id-langga.116685
record_format dspace
spelling id-langga.1166852022-06-09T04:25:09Z https://repository.unair.ac.id/116685/ Ciprofloxacine In The Treatment Of Lower Respiratory Tract Infections: A Comparative Study Against Penicillin And Chloramphenicol Hood Alsagaff, Dr. RC705-779 Diseases of the respiratory system A double blind, randomized, controlled study on the efficacy and safety of oral ciprofloxacin (500 mg bid.) in pneumonia as compared to the standard therapy of proc.penicillin G (600.000 U i.m. bid.) plus chioramphenicol (1 gr i.v. bid.) was done. Bacteriologic specimens were obtained by transtra¬cheal aspirations . Results : N = 80 ; Ciprofloxacin gave a 95 % suc¬cess rate, v/s 92.5 % for the control group ( no p, may be due to type II error). However to be fair the ciprofloxacin group did achieve a quicker defervescence, a shorter hospital stay and better radiological resolution. No side effects were reported in both groups. Conclusion : Ciprofloxacin is an excellent alterna¬tive against the time honored regimen of Penicillin plus Chloramphenicol in lower respiratory tract infections, given their good tissue penetration, good safety record and convenient oral use. The cost of therapy is not solely related to the purchase of the drug, but also to its route of administration. Par enteral administration will involve considerably more nursing time and supervi¬sion, translating into higher cost to the patient. Empirical treatment must be given before bacterio¬logical result are known. However without epidemio¬logical evidence of pathogens and antibiotic sensi-tivities provided by sputum cultures, there can be no best guess therapy. Nevertheless given their known bacterologic efficacy, in severe disease and in the immunocompromised host where resistant or multiple pathogens may be involved, ciprofloxacin can be an excellent choice. Dept. of Pulmonology, Airlangga School of Medicine 1980 Monograph NonPeerReviewed text en https://repository.unair.ac.id/116685/1/R%20616.200%2046%20Als%20c2.pdf Hood Alsagaff, Dr. (1980) Ciprofloxacine In The Treatment Of Lower Respiratory Tract Infections: A Comparative Study Against Penicillin And Chloramphenicol. Laporan Penelitian. Dept. of Pulmonology, Airlangga School of Medicine, SURABAYA. (Unpublished) http://lib.unair.ac.id
institution Universitas Airlangga
building Universitas Airlangga Library
continent Asia
country Indonesia
Indonesia
content_provider Universitas Airlangga Library
collection UNAIR Repository
language English
topic RC705-779 Diseases of the respiratory system
spellingShingle RC705-779 Diseases of the respiratory system
Hood Alsagaff, Dr.
Ciprofloxacine In The Treatment Of Lower Respiratory Tract Infections: A Comparative Study Against Penicillin And Chloramphenicol
description A double blind, randomized, controlled study on the efficacy and safety of oral ciprofloxacin (500 mg bid.) in pneumonia as compared to the standard therapy of proc.penicillin G (600.000 U i.m. bid.) plus chioramphenicol (1 gr i.v. bid.) was done. Bacteriologic specimens were obtained by transtra¬cheal aspirations . Results : N = 80 ; Ciprofloxacin gave a 95 % suc¬cess rate, v/s 92.5 % for the control group ( no p, may be due to type II error). However to be fair the ciprofloxacin group did achieve a quicker defervescence, a shorter hospital stay and better radiological resolution. No side effects were reported in both groups. Conclusion : Ciprofloxacin is an excellent alterna¬tive against the time honored regimen of Penicillin plus Chloramphenicol in lower respiratory tract infections, given their good tissue penetration, good safety record and convenient oral use. The cost of therapy is not solely related to the purchase of the drug, but also to its route of administration. Par enteral administration will involve considerably more nursing time and supervi¬sion, translating into higher cost to the patient. Empirical treatment must be given before bacterio¬logical result are known. However without epidemio¬logical evidence of pathogens and antibiotic sensi-tivities provided by sputum cultures, there can be no best guess therapy. Nevertheless given their known bacterologic efficacy, in severe disease and in the immunocompromised host where resistant or multiple pathogens may be involved, ciprofloxacin can be an excellent choice.
format Monograph
NonPeerReviewed
author Hood Alsagaff, Dr.
author_facet Hood Alsagaff, Dr.
author_sort Hood Alsagaff, Dr.
title Ciprofloxacine In The Treatment Of Lower Respiratory Tract Infections: A Comparative Study Against Penicillin And Chloramphenicol
title_short Ciprofloxacine In The Treatment Of Lower Respiratory Tract Infections: A Comparative Study Against Penicillin And Chloramphenicol
title_full Ciprofloxacine In The Treatment Of Lower Respiratory Tract Infections: A Comparative Study Against Penicillin And Chloramphenicol
title_fullStr Ciprofloxacine In The Treatment Of Lower Respiratory Tract Infections: A Comparative Study Against Penicillin And Chloramphenicol
title_full_unstemmed Ciprofloxacine In The Treatment Of Lower Respiratory Tract Infections: A Comparative Study Against Penicillin And Chloramphenicol
title_sort ciprofloxacine in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections: a comparative study against penicillin and chloramphenicol
publisher Dept. of Pulmonology, Airlangga School of Medicine
publishDate 1980
url https://repository.unair.ac.id/116685/1/R%20616.200%2046%20Als%20c2.pdf
https://repository.unair.ac.id/116685/
http://lib.unair.ac.id
_version_ 1735493366373679104