Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) Versus Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia (IV PCA) for Acute Postoperative Pain Relief in Minimally Invasive Abdominal Surgeries: A Systematic Review
To reduce acute postoperative pain in major abdominal surgeries, patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) has been considered the gold standard. However, in recent years, its safety is being questioned as despite its low incidence rate of serious complications, these complications are often very...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article PeerReviewed |
Language: | English English English English |
Published: |
Cancer Research Institute, Sapporo Medical University
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://repository.unair.ac.id/120012/1/Artikel%205.pdf https://repository.unair.ac.id/120012/2/Bukti%20Korespondensi%205.pdf https://repository.unair.ac.id/120012/3/Similarity%205.pdf https://repository.unair.ac.id/120012/4/Karil%205.pdf https://repository.unair.ac.id/120012/ https://www.maejournal.com/article/patient-controlled-epidural-analgesia-pcea-versus-intravenous-patient-controlled-analgesia-iv-pca-for-acute-postoperative-pain-relief-in-minimally-invasive-abdominal-surgeries-a-systematic-review |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universitas Airlangga |
Language: | English English English English |
id |
id-langga.120012 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
id-langga.1200122023-02-18T02:00:14Z https://repository.unair.ac.id/120012/ Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) Versus Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia (IV PCA) for Acute Postoperative Pain Relief in Minimally Invasive Abdominal Surgeries: A Systematic Review Junjungan Nimasratu Rahmatsani, - Bambang Pujo Semedi, - Ahmad Yudianto, - Christrijogo Sumartono Waloejo, - R Medicine (General) RC Internal medicine To reduce acute postoperative pain in major abdominal surgeries, patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) has been considered the gold standard. However, in recent years, its safety is being questioned as despite its low incidence rate of serious complications, these complications are often very dangerous nevertheless. On the other hand, for minimally invasive surgeries (MIS) with estimated reduced postoperative pain, intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) is seen as a possibly more effective alternative due to the autonomy and satisfaction given to the patient. A systematic review of previous RCTs and clinical trials of patients undergoing abdominal MIS was done to compare acute postoperative pain, length of hospital stay, time to first flatus, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) between PCEA and IV PCA. During movement, pain scores consistently showed a lower pain score in the PCEA group rather than the IV PCA group, because epidural analgesia with local anesthetics blocks non-nociceptive stimuli on top of nociceptive stimuli. Only 1 study showed > 0.1 day difference in length of stay after surgery. The IV PCA group took a longer time to first flatus and showed a higher percentage of patients experiencing PONV than in the PCEA group. This review showed that incidence of severe complications in PCEA proves to be low and is therefore the best method to reduce postoperative pain in abdominal MIS. Cancer Research Institute, Sapporo Medical University 2020 Article PeerReviewed text en https://repository.unair.ac.id/120012/1/Artikel%205.pdf text en https://repository.unair.ac.id/120012/2/Bukti%20Korespondensi%205.pdf text en https://repository.unair.ac.id/120012/3/Similarity%205.pdf text en https://repository.unair.ac.id/120012/4/Karil%205.pdf Junjungan Nimasratu Rahmatsani, - and Bambang Pujo Semedi, - and Ahmad Yudianto, - and Christrijogo Sumartono Waloejo, - (2020) Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) Versus Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia (IV PCA) for Acute Postoperative Pain Relief in Minimally Invasive Abdominal Surgeries: A Systematic Review. Sappaoro Medical Journal, 54 (1). pp. 1-30. ISSN 0036472X https://www.maejournal.com/article/patient-controlled-epidural-analgesia-pcea-versus-intravenous-patient-controlled-analgesia-iv-pca-for-acute-postoperative-pain-relief-in-minimally-invasive-abdominal-surgeries-a-systematic-review |
institution |
Universitas Airlangga |
building |
Universitas Airlangga Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Indonesia Indonesia |
content_provider |
Universitas Airlangga Library |
collection |
UNAIR Repository |
language |
English English English English |
topic |
R Medicine (General) RC Internal medicine |
spellingShingle |
R Medicine (General) RC Internal medicine Junjungan Nimasratu Rahmatsani, - Bambang Pujo Semedi, - Ahmad Yudianto, - Christrijogo Sumartono Waloejo, - Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) Versus Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia (IV PCA) for Acute Postoperative Pain Relief in Minimally Invasive Abdominal Surgeries: A Systematic Review |
description |
To reduce acute postoperative pain in major abdominal surgeries, patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) has been considered the gold standard. However, in recent years, its safety is being questioned as despite its low incidence rate of serious complications, these complications are often very dangerous nevertheless. On the other hand, for minimally invasive surgeries (MIS) with estimated reduced postoperative pain, intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) is seen as a possibly more effective alternative due to the autonomy and satisfaction given to the patient. A systematic review of previous RCTs and clinical trials of patients undergoing abdominal MIS was done to compare acute postoperative pain, length of hospital stay, time to first flatus, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) between PCEA and IV PCA. During movement, pain scores consistently showed a lower pain score in the PCEA group rather than the IV PCA group, because epidural analgesia with local anesthetics blocks non-nociceptive stimuli on top of nociceptive stimuli. Only 1 study showed > 0.1 day difference in length of stay after surgery. The IV PCA group took a longer time to first flatus and showed a higher percentage of patients experiencing PONV than in the PCEA group. This review showed that incidence of severe complications in PCEA proves to be low and is therefore the best method to reduce postoperative pain in abdominal MIS. |
format |
Article PeerReviewed |
author |
Junjungan Nimasratu Rahmatsani, - Bambang Pujo Semedi, - Ahmad Yudianto, - Christrijogo Sumartono Waloejo, - |
author_facet |
Junjungan Nimasratu Rahmatsani, - Bambang Pujo Semedi, - Ahmad Yudianto, - Christrijogo Sumartono Waloejo, - |
author_sort |
Junjungan Nimasratu Rahmatsani, - |
title |
Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) Versus Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia (IV PCA) for Acute Postoperative Pain Relief in Minimally Invasive Abdominal Surgeries: A Systematic Review |
title_short |
Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) Versus Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia (IV PCA) for Acute Postoperative Pain Relief in Minimally Invasive Abdominal Surgeries: A Systematic Review |
title_full |
Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) Versus Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia (IV PCA) for Acute Postoperative Pain Relief in Minimally Invasive Abdominal Surgeries: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr |
Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) Versus Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia (IV PCA) for Acute Postoperative Pain Relief in Minimally Invasive Abdominal Surgeries: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) Versus Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia (IV PCA) for Acute Postoperative Pain Relief in Minimally Invasive Abdominal Surgeries: A Systematic Review |
title_sort |
patient-controlled epidural analgesia (pcea) versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (iv pca) for acute postoperative pain relief in minimally invasive abdominal surgeries: a systematic review |
publisher |
Cancer Research Institute, Sapporo Medical University |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://repository.unair.ac.id/120012/1/Artikel%205.pdf https://repository.unair.ac.id/120012/2/Bukti%20Korespondensi%205.pdf https://repository.unair.ac.id/120012/3/Similarity%205.pdf https://repository.unair.ac.id/120012/4/Karil%205.pdf https://repository.unair.ac.id/120012/ https://www.maejournal.com/article/patient-controlled-epidural-analgesia-pcea-versus-intravenous-patient-controlled-analgesia-iv-pca-for-acute-postoperative-pain-relief-in-minimally-invasive-abdominal-surgeries-a-systematic-review |
_version_ |
1759060437482078208 |