Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) Versus Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia (IV PCA) for Acute Postoperative Pain Relief in Minimally Invasive Abdominal Surgeries: A Systematic Review

To reduce acute postoperative pain in major abdominal surgeries, patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) has been considered the gold standard. However, in recent years, its safety is being questioned as despite its low incidence rate of serious complications, these complications are often very...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Junjungan Nimasratu Rahmatsani, -, Bambang Pujo Semedi, -, Ahmad Yudianto, -, Christrijogo Sumartono Waloejo, -
Format: Article PeerReviewed
Language:English
English
English
English
Published: Cancer Research Institute, Sapporo Medical University 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.unair.ac.id/120012/1/Artikel%205.pdf
https://repository.unair.ac.id/120012/2/Bukti%20Korespondensi%205.pdf
https://repository.unair.ac.id/120012/3/Similarity%205.pdf
https://repository.unair.ac.id/120012/4/Karil%205.pdf
https://repository.unair.ac.id/120012/
https://www.maejournal.com/article/patient-controlled-epidural-analgesia-pcea-versus-intravenous-patient-controlled-analgesia-iv-pca-for-acute-postoperative-pain-relief-in-minimally-invasive-abdominal-surgeries-a-systematic-review
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universitas Airlangga
Language: English
English
English
English
id id-langga.120012
record_format dspace
spelling id-langga.1200122023-02-18T02:00:14Z https://repository.unair.ac.id/120012/ Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) Versus Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia (IV PCA) for Acute Postoperative Pain Relief in Minimally Invasive Abdominal Surgeries: A Systematic Review Junjungan Nimasratu Rahmatsani, - Bambang Pujo Semedi, - Ahmad Yudianto, - Christrijogo Sumartono Waloejo, - R Medicine (General) RC Internal medicine To reduce acute postoperative pain in major abdominal surgeries, patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) has been considered the gold standard. However, in recent years, its safety is being questioned as despite its low incidence rate of serious complications, these complications are often very dangerous nevertheless. On the other hand, for minimally invasive surgeries (MIS) with estimated reduced postoperative pain, intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) is seen as a possibly more effective alternative due to the autonomy and satisfaction given to the patient. A systematic review of previous RCTs and clinical trials of patients undergoing abdominal MIS was done to compare acute postoperative pain, length of hospital stay, time to first flatus, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) between PCEA and IV PCA. During movement, pain scores consistently showed a lower pain score in the PCEA group rather than the IV PCA group, because epidural analgesia with local anesthetics blocks non-nociceptive stimuli on top of nociceptive stimuli. Only 1 study showed > 0.1 day difference in length of stay after surgery. The IV PCA group took a longer time to first flatus and showed a higher percentage of patients experiencing PONV than in the PCEA group. This review showed that incidence of severe complications in PCEA proves to be low and is therefore the best method to reduce postoperative pain in abdominal MIS. Cancer Research Institute, Sapporo Medical University 2020 Article PeerReviewed text en https://repository.unair.ac.id/120012/1/Artikel%205.pdf text en https://repository.unair.ac.id/120012/2/Bukti%20Korespondensi%205.pdf text en https://repository.unair.ac.id/120012/3/Similarity%205.pdf text en https://repository.unair.ac.id/120012/4/Karil%205.pdf Junjungan Nimasratu Rahmatsani, - and Bambang Pujo Semedi, - and Ahmad Yudianto, - and Christrijogo Sumartono Waloejo, - (2020) Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) Versus Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia (IV PCA) for Acute Postoperative Pain Relief in Minimally Invasive Abdominal Surgeries: A Systematic Review. Sappaoro Medical Journal, 54 (1). pp. 1-30. ISSN 0036472X https://www.maejournal.com/article/patient-controlled-epidural-analgesia-pcea-versus-intravenous-patient-controlled-analgesia-iv-pca-for-acute-postoperative-pain-relief-in-minimally-invasive-abdominal-surgeries-a-systematic-review
institution Universitas Airlangga
building Universitas Airlangga Library
continent Asia
country Indonesia
Indonesia
content_provider Universitas Airlangga Library
collection UNAIR Repository
language English
English
English
English
topic R Medicine (General)
RC Internal medicine
spellingShingle R Medicine (General)
RC Internal medicine
Junjungan Nimasratu Rahmatsani, -
Bambang Pujo Semedi, -
Ahmad Yudianto, -
Christrijogo Sumartono Waloejo, -
Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) Versus Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia (IV PCA) for Acute Postoperative Pain Relief in Minimally Invasive Abdominal Surgeries: A Systematic Review
description To reduce acute postoperative pain in major abdominal surgeries, patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) has been considered the gold standard. However, in recent years, its safety is being questioned as despite its low incidence rate of serious complications, these complications are often very dangerous nevertheless. On the other hand, for minimally invasive surgeries (MIS) with estimated reduced postoperative pain, intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) is seen as a possibly more effective alternative due to the autonomy and satisfaction given to the patient. A systematic review of previous RCTs and clinical trials of patients undergoing abdominal MIS was done to compare acute postoperative pain, length of hospital stay, time to first flatus, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) between PCEA and IV PCA. During movement, pain scores consistently showed a lower pain score in the PCEA group rather than the IV PCA group, because epidural analgesia with local anesthetics blocks non-nociceptive stimuli on top of nociceptive stimuli. Only 1 study showed > 0.1 day difference in length of stay after surgery. The IV PCA group took a longer time to first flatus and showed a higher percentage of patients experiencing PONV than in the PCEA group. This review showed that incidence of severe complications in PCEA proves to be low and is therefore the best method to reduce postoperative pain in abdominal MIS.
format Article
PeerReviewed
author Junjungan Nimasratu Rahmatsani, -
Bambang Pujo Semedi, -
Ahmad Yudianto, -
Christrijogo Sumartono Waloejo, -
author_facet Junjungan Nimasratu Rahmatsani, -
Bambang Pujo Semedi, -
Ahmad Yudianto, -
Christrijogo Sumartono Waloejo, -
author_sort Junjungan Nimasratu Rahmatsani, -
title Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) Versus Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia (IV PCA) for Acute Postoperative Pain Relief in Minimally Invasive Abdominal Surgeries: A Systematic Review
title_short Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) Versus Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia (IV PCA) for Acute Postoperative Pain Relief in Minimally Invasive Abdominal Surgeries: A Systematic Review
title_full Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) Versus Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia (IV PCA) for Acute Postoperative Pain Relief in Minimally Invasive Abdominal Surgeries: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) Versus Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia (IV PCA) for Acute Postoperative Pain Relief in Minimally Invasive Abdominal Surgeries: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) Versus Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia (IV PCA) for Acute Postoperative Pain Relief in Minimally Invasive Abdominal Surgeries: A Systematic Review
title_sort patient-controlled epidural analgesia (pcea) versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (iv pca) for acute postoperative pain relief in minimally invasive abdominal surgeries: a systematic review
publisher Cancer Research Institute, Sapporo Medical University
publishDate 2020
url https://repository.unair.ac.id/120012/1/Artikel%205.pdf
https://repository.unair.ac.id/120012/2/Bukti%20Korespondensi%205.pdf
https://repository.unair.ac.id/120012/3/Similarity%205.pdf
https://repository.unair.ac.id/120012/4/Karil%205.pdf
https://repository.unair.ac.id/120012/
https://www.maejournal.com/article/patient-controlled-epidural-analgesia-pcea-versus-intravenous-patient-controlled-analgesia-iv-pca-for-acute-postoperative-pain-relief-in-minimally-invasive-abdominal-surgeries-a-systematic-review
_version_ 1759060437482078208