Quality and Reliability of Halitosis Videos on YouTube as a Source of Information

• Main Authors: Atik Ramadhani, -, Zenobia Zettira, -, Yuanita Lely Rachmawati, -, Ninuk Hariyani, -, Diah Ayu Maharani, -
• Format: Article PeerReviewed
• Language: English; English; English
• Published: 2021
• Subjects: RK Dentistry
• Online Access: https://repository.unair.ac.id/123142/1/14.pdf; https://repository.unair.ac.id/123142/2/14.pdf; https://repository.unair.ac.id/123142/3/14.pdf; https://repository.unair.ac.id/123142/; https://www.mdpi.com/journal/dentistry; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj9100120
• Institution: Universitas Airlangga

Abstract: Halitosis is a common condition that adversely affects quality of life. Through YouTube, people access oral health information. This study aimed to analyze the quality and comprehensiveness of the content, and reliability of halitosis videos hosted on YouTube. In total, 300 videos were collected based on three search keywords, and the number of likes, dislikes, views, duration, interaction index, viewing rate, and source category. Subsequently, the video score, which represents the content quality and comprehensiveness was used to categorize videos as poor, good, and excellent. DISCERN score was used to assess video reliability. Of the 105 videos analyzed, 68 (64.8%) were uploaded by personal users. In general, videos were categorized as poor and have low reliability. Videos sourced from healthcare professionals showed the highest quality, comprehensiveness of the content, and reliability (p < 0.05). There was no difference in the number of viewers for video duration less than or more than 4 min (p > 0.05). YouTube users prefer low-quality videos over high-quality ones, indicating that viewers cannot differentiate between reliable and potentially biased content. It is critical to enable viewers to critically assimilate information hosted on YouTube to make effective oral healthcare decisions.