Microleakage Differences on Composite Resin Restoration with and without Nanohybrid Flowable Composite Resin as a Surface Sealant

Polymerization shrinkage occurred in composite resin restoration during the polymerization process. Polymerization shrinkage may cause microleakage in the middle of restoration margin and resulting in bacteria, debris, ion, and molecule penetration in margin of composite resin restoration. Second...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aditya Arinta Putra, -, Ruslan Effendy, -, Devi Eka Yuniarti, -
Format: Article PeerReviewed
Language:English
English
English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.unair.ac.id/123724/1/1.pdf
https://repository.unair.ac.id/123724/2/1.pdf
https://repository.unair.ac.id/123724/3/1.pdf
https://repository.unair.ac.id/123724/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universitas Airlangga
Language: English
English
English
id id-langga.123724
record_format dspace
spelling id-langga.1237242023-04-17T00:56:26Z https://repository.unair.ac.id/123724/ Microleakage Differences on Composite Resin Restoration with and without Nanohybrid Flowable Composite Resin as a Surface Sealant Aditya Arinta Putra, - Ruslan Effendy, - Devi Eka Yuniarti, - RK Dentistry Polymerization shrinkage occurred in composite resin restoration during the polymerization process. Polymerization shrinkage may cause microleakage in the middle of restoration margin and resulting in bacteria, debris, ion, and molecule penetration in margin of composite resin restoration. Secondary caries, pulpal sensitivity, restoration crack, and pulpal irritation are some complications of polymerization shringkage. Surface sealant application on composite restoration surface prevents microleakage. Surface sealant with nanohybrid filler is fine preference to prevents microleakage due to its physical properties and a good wear resistance. The aim of this study is to analyze of nanohybrid flowable composite resins as a surface sealant on microleakage score in composite resin restoration. Upper premolar teeth (n=16) with class I cavity were divided into two groups. Group 1 was treated with packable composite restoration without surface sealant application. Group 2 was treated with packable composite restoration with nanohybrid flowable composite as a surface sealant. All groups immersed in 0.5% of methylene blue solution for 24 hours and then rinsed with water and separated bucco-lingualy with carbondurum disc. Afterward, each section assessed for dye penetration to represent microleakage by using a scoring method under a digital microscope. Data were collected and statistically analyzed using Man Whitney. The restoration with nanohybrid flowable composite surface sealant application shows a significant difference between group 1 and group 2 (p<0,05). Nanohybrid flowable composite surface sealant shows a significant result to decrease microleakage score in resin composite restoration. 2018 Article PeerReviewed text en https://repository.unair.ac.id/123724/1/1.pdf text en https://repository.unair.ac.id/123724/2/1.pdf text en https://repository.unair.ac.id/123724/3/1.pdf Aditya Arinta Putra, - and Ruslan Effendy, - and Devi Eka Yuniarti, - (2018) Microleakage Differences on Composite Resin Restoration with and without Nanohybrid Flowable Composite Resin as a Surface Sealant. Journal of International Dental and Medical Research.
institution Universitas Airlangga
building Universitas Airlangga Library
continent Asia
country Indonesia
Indonesia
content_provider Universitas Airlangga Library
collection UNAIR Repository
language English
English
English
topic RK Dentistry
spellingShingle RK Dentistry
Aditya Arinta Putra, -
Ruslan Effendy, -
Devi Eka Yuniarti, -
Microleakage Differences on Composite Resin Restoration with and without Nanohybrid Flowable Composite Resin as a Surface Sealant
description Polymerization shrinkage occurred in composite resin restoration during the polymerization process. Polymerization shrinkage may cause microleakage in the middle of restoration margin and resulting in bacteria, debris, ion, and molecule penetration in margin of composite resin restoration. Secondary caries, pulpal sensitivity, restoration crack, and pulpal irritation are some complications of polymerization shringkage. Surface sealant application on composite restoration surface prevents microleakage. Surface sealant with nanohybrid filler is fine preference to prevents microleakage due to its physical properties and a good wear resistance. The aim of this study is to analyze of nanohybrid flowable composite resins as a surface sealant on microleakage score in composite resin restoration. Upper premolar teeth (n=16) with class I cavity were divided into two groups. Group 1 was treated with packable composite restoration without surface sealant application. Group 2 was treated with packable composite restoration with nanohybrid flowable composite as a surface sealant. All groups immersed in 0.5% of methylene blue solution for 24 hours and then rinsed with water and separated bucco-lingualy with carbondurum disc. Afterward, each section assessed for dye penetration to represent microleakage by using a scoring method under a digital microscope. Data were collected and statistically analyzed using Man Whitney. The restoration with nanohybrid flowable composite surface sealant application shows a significant difference between group 1 and group 2 (p<0,05). Nanohybrid flowable composite surface sealant shows a significant result to decrease microleakage score in resin composite restoration.
format Article
PeerReviewed
author Aditya Arinta Putra, -
Ruslan Effendy, -
Devi Eka Yuniarti, -
author_facet Aditya Arinta Putra, -
Ruslan Effendy, -
Devi Eka Yuniarti, -
author_sort Aditya Arinta Putra, -
title Microleakage Differences on Composite Resin Restoration with and without Nanohybrid Flowable Composite Resin as a Surface Sealant
title_short Microleakage Differences on Composite Resin Restoration with and without Nanohybrid Flowable Composite Resin as a Surface Sealant
title_full Microleakage Differences on Composite Resin Restoration with and without Nanohybrid Flowable Composite Resin as a Surface Sealant
title_fullStr Microleakage Differences on Composite Resin Restoration with and without Nanohybrid Flowable Composite Resin as a Surface Sealant
title_full_unstemmed Microleakage Differences on Composite Resin Restoration with and without Nanohybrid Flowable Composite Resin as a Surface Sealant
title_sort microleakage differences on composite resin restoration with and without nanohybrid flowable composite resin as a surface sealant
publishDate 2018
url https://repository.unair.ac.id/123724/1/1.pdf
https://repository.unair.ac.id/123724/2/1.pdf
https://repository.unair.ac.id/123724/3/1.pdf
https://repository.unair.ac.id/123724/
_version_ 1764209109794553856