Microleakage Differences on Composite Resin Restoration with and without Nanohybrid Flowable Composite Resin as a Surface Sealant
Polymerization shrinkage occurred in composite resin restoration during the polymerization process. Polymerization shrinkage may cause microleakage in the middle of restoration margin and resulting in bacteria, debris, ion, and molecule penetration in margin of composite resin restoration. Second...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article PeerReviewed |
Language: | English English English |
Published: |
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://repository.unair.ac.id/123724/1/1.pdf https://repository.unair.ac.id/123724/2/1.pdf https://repository.unair.ac.id/123724/3/1.pdf https://repository.unair.ac.id/123724/ |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universitas Airlangga |
Language: | English English English |
id |
id-langga.123724 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
id-langga.1237242023-04-17T00:56:26Z https://repository.unair.ac.id/123724/ Microleakage Differences on Composite Resin Restoration with and without Nanohybrid Flowable Composite Resin as a Surface Sealant Aditya Arinta Putra, - Ruslan Effendy, - Devi Eka Yuniarti, - RK Dentistry Polymerization shrinkage occurred in composite resin restoration during the polymerization process. Polymerization shrinkage may cause microleakage in the middle of restoration margin and resulting in bacteria, debris, ion, and molecule penetration in margin of composite resin restoration. Secondary caries, pulpal sensitivity, restoration crack, and pulpal irritation are some complications of polymerization shringkage. Surface sealant application on composite restoration surface prevents microleakage. Surface sealant with nanohybrid filler is fine preference to prevents microleakage due to its physical properties and a good wear resistance. The aim of this study is to analyze of nanohybrid flowable composite resins as a surface sealant on microleakage score in composite resin restoration. Upper premolar teeth (n=16) with class I cavity were divided into two groups. Group 1 was treated with packable composite restoration without surface sealant application. Group 2 was treated with packable composite restoration with nanohybrid flowable composite as a surface sealant. All groups immersed in 0.5% of methylene blue solution for 24 hours and then rinsed with water and separated bucco-lingualy with carbondurum disc. Afterward, each section assessed for dye penetration to represent microleakage by using a scoring method under a digital microscope. Data were collected and statistically analyzed using Man Whitney. The restoration with nanohybrid flowable composite surface sealant application shows a significant difference between group 1 and group 2 (p<0,05). Nanohybrid flowable composite surface sealant shows a significant result to decrease microleakage score in resin composite restoration. 2018 Article PeerReviewed text en https://repository.unair.ac.id/123724/1/1.pdf text en https://repository.unair.ac.id/123724/2/1.pdf text en https://repository.unair.ac.id/123724/3/1.pdf Aditya Arinta Putra, - and Ruslan Effendy, - and Devi Eka Yuniarti, - (2018) Microleakage Differences on Composite Resin Restoration with and without Nanohybrid Flowable Composite Resin as a Surface Sealant. Journal of International Dental and Medical Research. |
institution |
Universitas Airlangga |
building |
Universitas Airlangga Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Indonesia Indonesia |
content_provider |
Universitas Airlangga Library |
collection |
UNAIR Repository |
language |
English English English |
topic |
RK Dentistry |
spellingShingle |
RK Dentistry Aditya Arinta Putra, - Ruslan Effendy, - Devi Eka Yuniarti, - Microleakage Differences on Composite Resin Restoration with and without Nanohybrid Flowable Composite Resin as a Surface Sealant |
description |
Polymerization shrinkage occurred in composite resin restoration during the polymerization
process. Polymerization shrinkage may cause microleakage in the middle of restoration margin and
resulting in bacteria, debris, ion, and molecule penetration in margin of composite resin restoration.
Secondary caries, pulpal sensitivity, restoration crack, and pulpal irritation are some complications
of polymerization shringkage. Surface sealant application on composite restoration surface
prevents microleakage. Surface sealant with nanohybrid filler is fine preference to prevents
microleakage due to its physical properties and a good wear resistance.
The aim of this study is to analyze of nanohybrid flowable composite resins as a surface sealant
on microleakage score in composite resin restoration.
Upper premolar teeth (n=16) with class I cavity were divided into two groups. Group 1 was treated
with packable composite restoration without surface sealant application. Group 2 was treated with
packable composite restoration with nanohybrid flowable composite as a surface sealant. All
groups immersed in 0.5% of methylene blue solution for 24 hours and then rinsed with water and
separated bucco-lingualy with carbondurum disc. Afterward, each section assessed for dye
penetration to represent microleakage by using a scoring method under a digital microscope. Data
were collected and statistically analyzed using Man Whitney.
The restoration with nanohybrid flowable composite surface sealant application shows a
significant difference between group 1 and group 2 (p<0,05).
Nanohybrid flowable composite surface sealant shows a significant result to decrease
microleakage score in resin composite restoration. |
format |
Article PeerReviewed |
author |
Aditya Arinta Putra, - Ruslan Effendy, - Devi Eka Yuniarti, - |
author_facet |
Aditya Arinta Putra, - Ruslan Effendy, - Devi Eka Yuniarti, - |
author_sort |
Aditya Arinta Putra, - |
title |
Microleakage Differences on Composite Resin Restoration with and without
Nanohybrid Flowable Composite Resin as a Surface Sealant |
title_short |
Microleakage Differences on Composite Resin Restoration with and without
Nanohybrid Flowable Composite Resin as a Surface Sealant |
title_full |
Microleakage Differences on Composite Resin Restoration with and without
Nanohybrid Flowable Composite Resin as a Surface Sealant |
title_fullStr |
Microleakage Differences on Composite Resin Restoration with and without
Nanohybrid Flowable Composite Resin as a Surface Sealant |
title_full_unstemmed |
Microleakage Differences on Composite Resin Restoration with and without
Nanohybrid Flowable Composite Resin as a Surface Sealant |
title_sort |
microleakage differences on composite resin restoration with and without
nanohybrid flowable composite resin as a surface sealant |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://repository.unair.ac.id/123724/1/1.pdf https://repository.unair.ac.id/123724/2/1.pdf https://repository.unair.ac.id/123724/3/1.pdf https://repository.unair.ac.id/123724/ |
_version_ |
1764209109794553856 |