Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Versus Conventional Wound Care In Cancer Surgical Wounds: A Meta-Analysis Of Observational Studies And Randomised Controlled Trials

Abstract The application of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in cancer surgical wounds is still controversial, despite its promising usage, because of the risks of increased tumorigenesis and metastasis. This study aimed to review the risks and benefits of NPWT in surgical wounds with the und...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Indri Lakhsmi Putri, Indri, Lavonia Berlina Adzalika, Lavonia, Rachmaniar Pramanasari, Rachmaniar, Citrawati Dyah Kencono Wungu, Citrawati
Format: Article PeerReviewed
Language:English
Indonesian
English
English
Published: Wiley-Blackwell
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.unair.ac.id/124780/1/01%20artikel.pdf
https://repository.unair.ac.id/124780/2/1.%20karil.pdf
https://repository.unair.ac.id/124780/4/1.%20turnitin.pdf
https://repository.unair.ac.id/124780/8/Korespondensi.pdf
https://repository.unair.ac.id/124780/
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iwj.13756
https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13756
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universitas Airlangga
Language: English
Indonesian
English
English
Description
Summary:Abstract The application of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in cancer surgical wounds is still controversial, despite its promising usage, because of the risks of increased tumorigenesis and metastasis. This study aimed to review the risks and benefits of NPWT in surgical wounds with the underlying malignant disease compared with conventional wound care (CWC). The first outcome was wound complications, divided into surgical site infection (SSI), seroma, hematoma, and wound dehiscence. The secondary outcome was hospital readmission. We performed a separate meta-analysis of observational studies and randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with CI 95%. Thirteen observational studies with 1923 patients and seven RCTs with 1091 patients were included. NPWT group showed significant decrease in the risk of SSI (RR = 0.45) and seroma (RR = 0.61) in observational studies with P value <0.05, as well as RCTs but were not significant (RR = 0.88 and RR = 0.68). Wound dehiscence (RR = 0.74 and RR = 1.15) and hospital readmission (RR = 0.90 and RR = 0.62) showed lower risks in NPWT group but were not significant. Hematoma (RR = 1.08 and RR = 0.87) showed no significant difference. NPWT is not contraindicated in cancer surgical wounds and can be considered a beneficial palliative treatment to promote wound healing.