Diagnostic accuracy of contrast and non-contrast 1.5 tesla magnetic resonance imaging for lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus based on surgical findings: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies
Abstract This study aims to provide the latest information regarding the accuracy of contrast and non-contrast 1.5 Tesla MRI in the diagnosis of lumbar Herniated Nucleus Pulposus (HNP) compared with surgical findings. We included studies with subjects diagnosed with lumbar HNP due to degenerative p...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article PeerReviewed |
Language: | English Indonesian English |
Published: |
Universidad Tecnica de Manabi
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://repository.unair.ac.id/126915/1/17%20Artikel.pdf https://repository.unair.ac.id/126915/2/17-%20Karil%20Review%201.pdf https://repository.unair.ac.id/126915/3/Turnitin%2017.pdf https://repository.unair.ac.id/126915/ https://scholar.unair.ac.id/en/publications/diagnostic-accuracy-of-contrast-and-non-contrast-15-tesla-magneti https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS6.10200 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universitas Airlangga |
Language: | English Indonesian English |
id |
id-langga.126915 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
id-langga.1269152023-05-31T08:29:26Z https://repository.unair.ac.id/126915/ Diagnostic accuracy of contrast and non-contrast 1.5 tesla magnetic resonance imaging for lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus based on surgical findings: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies Endra Wibisono Harmawan, - Tedy Apriawan, Tedy Eko Agus Subagio, Eko Muhammad Faris, Muhammad Sri Andreani Utomo, - Budi Utomo, Budi Abdul Hafid Bajamal, Abdul R5-920 Medicine (General) Abstract This study aims to provide the latest information regarding the accuracy of contrast and non-contrast 1.5 Tesla MRI in the diagnosis of lumbar Herniated Nucleus Pulposus (HNP) compared with surgical findings. We included studies with subjects diagnosed with lumbar HNP due to degenerative processes, preoperative 1.5 Tesla contrast, and non-contrast MRI and described the number of findings of MRI diagnostic tests (index test) on the actual conditions found during surgery (reference standard). We searched literature from 5 databases: ProQuest, Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Biomed Central, and ScienceDirect. The sensitivity and specificity of contrast and non-contrast 1.5 Tesla MRI ranged between 64-95% and 55-100% (95% CI) with the area under the curve above the threshold on the ROC curve. Two studies compared the accuracy of MRI and Computed Tomography (CT) myelography with a wider ROC curve on CT myelography than on MRI. The ROC curve which has a wide area under the curve above the threshold depicts the relationship between sensitivity and specificity, shows that contrast non-contrast 1.5 Tesla MRI has a good accuracy in HNP diagnostic. Universidad Tecnica de Manabi Article PeerReviewed text en https://repository.unair.ac.id/126915/1/17%20Artikel.pdf text id https://repository.unair.ac.id/126915/2/17-%20Karil%20Review%201.pdf text en https://repository.unair.ac.id/126915/3/Turnitin%2017.pdf Endra Wibisono Harmawan, - and Tedy Apriawan, Tedy and Eko Agus Subagio, Eko and Muhammad Faris, Muhammad and Sri Andreani Utomo, - and Budi Utomo, Budi and Abdul Hafid Bajamal, Abdul Diagnostic accuracy of contrast and non-contrast 1.5 tesla magnetic resonance imaging for lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus based on surgical findings: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies. International Journal of Health Sciences, 6. pp. 692-711. ISSN e-ISSN: 2550-696X https://scholar.unair.ac.id/en/publications/diagnostic-accuracy-of-contrast-and-non-contrast-15-tesla-magneti https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS6.10200 |
institution |
Universitas Airlangga |
building |
Universitas Airlangga Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Indonesia Indonesia |
content_provider |
Universitas Airlangga Library |
collection |
UNAIR Repository |
language |
English Indonesian English |
topic |
R5-920 Medicine (General) |
spellingShingle |
R5-920 Medicine (General) Endra Wibisono Harmawan, - Tedy Apriawan, Tedy Eko Agus Subagio, Eko Muhammad Faris, Muhammad Sri Andreani Utomo, - Budi Utomo, Budi Abdul Hafid Bajamal, Abdul Diagnostic accuracy of contrast and non-contrast 1.5 tesla magnetic resonance imaging for lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus based on surgical findings: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies |
description |
Abstract
This study aims to provide the latest information regarding the accuracy of contrast and non-contrast 1.5 Tesla MRI in the diagnosis of lumbar Herniated Nucleus Pulposus (HNP) compared with surgical findings. We included studies with subjects diagnosed with lumbar HNP due to degenerative processes, preoperative 1.5 Tesla contrast, and non-contrast MRI and described the number of findings of MRI diagnostic tests (index test) on the actual conditions found during surgery (reference standard). We searched literature from 5 databases: ProQuest, Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Biomed Central, and ScienceDirect. The sensitivity and specificity of contrast and non-contrast 1.5 Tesla MRI ranged between 64-95% and 55-100% (95% CI) with the area under the curve above the threshold on the ROC curve. Two studies compared the accuracy of MRI and Computed Tomography (CT) myelography with a wider ROC curve on CT myelography than on MRI. The ROC curve which has a wide area under the curve above the threshold depicts the relationship between sensitivity and specificity, shows that contrast non-contrast 1.5 Tesla MRI has a good accuracy in HNP diagnostic. |
format |
Article PeerReviewed |
author |
Endra Wibisono Harmawan, - Tedy Apriawan, Tedy Eko Agus Subagio, Eko Muhammad Faris, Muhammad Sri Andreani Utomo, - Budi Utomo, Budi Abdul Hafid Bajamal, Abdul |
author_facet |
Endra Wibisono Harmawan, - Tedy Apriawan, Tedy Eko Agus Subagio, Eko Muhammad Faris, Muhammad Sri Andreani Utomo, - Budi Utomo, Budi Abdul Hafid Bajamal, Abdul |
author_sort |
Endra Wibisono Harmawan, - |
title |
Diagnostic accuracy of contrast and non-contrast 1.5 tesla magnetic resonance imaging for lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus based on surgical findings: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies |
title_short |
Diagnostic accuracy of contrast and non-contrast 1.5 tesla magnetic resonance imaging for lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus based on surgical findings: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies |
title_full |
Diagnostic accuracy of contrast and non-contrast 1.5 tesla magnetic resonance imaging for lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus based on surgical findings: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies |
title_fullStr |
Diagnostic accuracy of contrast and non-contrast 1.5 tesla magnetic resonance imaging for lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus based on surgical findings: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies |
title_full_unstemmed |
Diagnostic accuracy of contrast and non-contrast 1.5 tesla magnetic resonance imaging for lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus based on surgical findings: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies |
title_sort |
diagnostic accuracy of contrast and non-contrast 1.5 tesla magnetic resonance imaging for lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus based on surgical findings: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies |
publisher |
Universidad Tecnica de Manabi |
url |
https://repository.unair.ac.id/126915/1/17%20Artikel.pdf https://repository.unair.ac.id/126915/2/17-%20Karil%20Review%201.pdf https://repository.unair.ac.id/126915/3/Turnitin%2017.pdf https://repository.unair.ac.id/126915/ https://scholar.unair.ac.id/en/publications/diagnostic-accuracy-of-contrast-and-non-contrast-15-tesla-magneti https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS6.10200 |
_version_ |
1768017655239802880 |