Comparison of Intraocular Pressure after Phacoemulsification Compared to Laser Peripheral Iridotomy (LPI) in Acute Primary Angle Closure (APAC) Patients: A Systematic Review
Abstract:Aim: To compare IOP in APAC patients after phacoemulsification compared to LPI.Background: Acute primary angle closure (APAC) is a type of PACG and an important cause of blindness in East Asia. In APAC patients, both LPI and phacoemulsification have been sho...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article PeerReviewed |
Language: | English Indonesian English |
Published: |
Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Airlangga
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://repository.unair.ac.id/127022/1/6%20Artikel.pdf https://repository.unair.ac.id/127022/2/6%20KARIL.pdf https://repository.unair.ac.id/127022/3/6%20Turnitin.pdf https://repository.unair.ac.id/127022/ https://cmro.in/index.php/jcmro/article/view/587 https://doi.org/10.52845/CMRO/2022/5-12-3 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universitas Airlangga |
Language: | English Indonesian English |
id |
id-langga.127022 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
id-langga.1270222023-06-08T05:36:39Z https://repository.unair.ac.id/127022/ Comparison of Intraocular Pressure after Phacoemulsification Compared to Laser Peripheral Iridotomy (LPI) in Acute Primary Angle Closure (APAC) Patients: A Systematic Review Aulia Zinedinita Rahmasari, - Nurwasis, - Indri Wahyuni, Indri Lilik Djuari, Lilik R5-920 Medicine (General) Abstract:Aim: To compare IOP in APAC patients after phacoemulsification compared to LPI.Background: Acute primary angle closure (APAC) is a type of PACG and an important cause of blindness in East Asia. In APAC patients, both LPI and phacoemulsification have been shown to be effective in controlling elevated IOP. Knowledge and information about changes in IOP after phacoemulsification and LPIin APAC patients, which is one of the criteria for successful APAC management, can be a reference as well as a consideration for choosing an effective treatment for APAC patients.Results: Of the 15 articles reviewed, 84% of patients who received phacoemulsification intervention experienced >50% reduction and 24.3% of patients experienced <50% decrease in post-op IOP compared with the mean pre-op IOP. While patients who received LPI intervention, 80.5% of patients experienced >50% reduction in IOP and 19.4% of patients experienced <50% reduction in IOP post-op compared with the mean pre-op IOP.Conclusion: There were decreases in IOP of APAC patients after phacoemulsification or LPI. In addition, there are differences in the decrease in IOP of APAC patients after phacoemulsification compared to LPI.Clinical Significance: Phacoemulsification and LPI are effective forlowering IOP in the early stages of an acute attack. LPIis the preferred procedure according to most guidelinesbecause it is relatively non-invasive, easy to administer on an outpatient basis, and has a lower risk of complications. Phacoemulsificatinhas been shown to be a more effective treatment than LPI for IOP reduction in early and medium-term IOP controls. Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Airlangga Article PeerReviewed text en https://repository.unair.ac.id/127022/1/6%20Artikel.pdf text id https://repository.unair.ac.id/127022/2/6%20KARIL.pdf text en https://repository.unair.ac.id/127022/3/6%20Turnitin.pdf Aulia Zinedinita Rahmasari, - and Nurwasis, - and Indri Wahyuni, Indri and Lilik Djuari, Lilik Comparison of Intraocular Pressure after Phacoemulsification Compared to Laser Peripheral Iridotomy (LPI) in Acute Primary Angle Closure (APAC) Patients: A Systematic Review. Journal of Current Medical Research and Opinion, 5 (12). pp. 1510-1519. ISSN 2589-8779 https://cmro.in/index.php/jcmro/article/view/587 https://doi.org/10.52845/CMRO/2022/5-12-3 |
institution |
Universitas Airlangga |
building |
Universitas Airlangga Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Indonesia Indonesia |
content_provider |
Universitas Airlangga Library |
collection |
UNAIR Repository |
language |
English Indonesian English |
topic |
R5-920 Medicine (General) |
spellingShingle |
R5-920 Medicine (General) Aulia Zinedinita Rahmasari, - Nurwasis, - Indri Wahyuni, Indri Lilik Djuari, Lilik Comparison of Intraocular Pressure after Phacoemulsification Compared to Laser Peripheral Iridotomy (LPI) in Acute Primary Angle Closure (APAC) Patients: A Systematic Review |
description |
Abstract:Aim: To compare IOP in APAC patients after phacoemulsification compared to LPI.Background: Acute primary angle closure (APAC) is a type of PACG and an important cause of blindness in East Asia. In APAC patients, both LPI and phacoemulsification have been shown to be effective in controlling elevated IOP. Knowledge and information about changes in IOP after phacoemulsification and LPIin APAC patients, which is one of the criteria for successful APAC management, can be a reference as well as a consideration for choosing an effective treatment for APAC patients.Results: Of the 15 articles reviewed, 84% of patients who received phacoemulsification intervention experienced >50% reduction and 24.3% of patients experienced <50% decrease in post-op IOP compared with the mean pre-op IOP. While patients who received LPI intervention, 80.5% of patients experienced >50% reduction in IOP and 19.4% of patients experienced <50% reduction in IOP post-op compared with the mean pre-op IOP.Conclusion: There were decreases in IOP of APAC patients after phacoemulsification or LPI. In addition, there are differences in the decrease in IOP of APAC patients after phacoemulsification compared to LPI.Clinical Significance: Phacoemulsification and LPI are effective forlowering IOP in the early stages of an acute attack. LPIis the preferred procedure according to most guidelinesbecause it is relatively non-invasive, easy to administer on an outpatient basis, and has a lower risk of complications. Phacoemulsificatinhas been shown to be a more effective treatment than LPI for IOP reduction in early and medium-term IOP controls. |
format |
Article PeerReviewed |
author |
Aulia Zinedinita Rahmasari, - Nurwasis, - Indri Wahyuni, Indri Lilik Djuari, Lilik |
author_facet |
Aulia Zinedinita Rahmasari, - Nurwasis, - Indri Wahyuni, Indri Lilik Djuari, Lilik |
author_sort |
Aulia Zinedinita Rahmasari, - |
title |
Comparison of Intraocular Pressure after Phacoemulsification
Compared to Laser Peripheral Iridotomy (LPI) in Acute Primary Angle Closure (APAC) Patients: A Systematic Review |
title_short |
Comparison of Intraocular Pressure after Phacoemulsification
Compared to Laser Peripheral Iridotomy (LPI) in Acute Primary Angle Closure (APAC) Patients: A Systematic Review |
title_full |
Comparison of Intraocular Pressure after Phacoemulsification
Compared to Laser Peripheral Iridotomy (LPI) in Acute Primary Angle Closure (APAC) Patients: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of Intraocular Pressure after Phacoemulsification
Compared to Laser Peripheral Iridotomy (LPI) in Acute Primary Angle Closure (APAC) Patients: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of Intraocular Pressure after Phacoemulsification
Compared to Laser Peripheral Iridotomy (LPI) in Acute Primary Angle Closure (APAC) Patients: A Systematic Review |
title_sort |
comparison of intraocular pressure after phacoemulsification
compared to laser peripheral iridotomy (lpi) in acute primary angle closure (apac) patients: a systematic review |
publisher |
Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Airlangga |
url |
https://repository.unair.ac.id/127022/1/6%20Artikel.pdf https://repository.unair.ac.id/127022/2/6%20KARIL.pdf https://repository.unair.ac.id/127022/3/6%20Turnitin.pdf https://repository.unair.ac.id/127022/ https://cmro.in/index.php/jcmro/article/view/587 https://doi.org/10.52845/CMRO/2022/5-12-3 |
_version_ |
1769840047481159680 |