Comparison of Intraocular Pressure after Phacoemulsification Compared to Laser Peripheral Iridotomy (LPI) in Acute Primary Angle Closure (APAC) Patients: A Systematic Review

Abstract:Aim: To compare IOP in APAC patients after phacoemulsification compared to LPI.Background: Acute primary angle closure (APAC) is a type of PACG and an important cause of blindness in East Asia. In APAC patients, both LPI and phacoemulsification have been sho...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aulia Zinedinita Rahmasari, -, Nurwasis, -, Indri Wahyuni, Indri, Lilik Djuari, Lilik
Format: Article PeerReviewed
Language:English
Indonesian
English
Published: Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Airlangga
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.unair.ac.id/127022/1/6%20Artikel.pdf
https://repository.unair.ac.id/127022/2/6%20KARIL.pdf
https://repository.unair.ac.id/127022/3/6%20Turnitin.pdf
https://repository.unair.ac.id/127022/
https://cmro.in/index.php/jcmro/article/view/587
https://doi.org/10.52845/CMRO/2022/5-12-3
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universitas Airlangga
Language: English
Indonesian
English
id id-langga.127022
record_format dspace
spelling id-langga.1270222023-06-08T05:36:39Z https://repository.unair.ac.id/127022/ Comparison of Intraocular Pressure after Phacoemulsification Compared to Laser Peripheral Iridotomy (LPI) in Acute Primary Angle Closure (APAC) Patients: A Systematic Review Aulia Zinedinita Rahmasari, - Nurwasis, - Indri Wahyuni, Indri Lilik Djuari, Lilik R5-920 Medicine (General) Abstract:Aim: To compare IOP in APAC patients after phacoemulsification compared to LPI.Background: Acute primary angle closure (APAC) is a type of PACG and an important cause of blindness in East Asia. In APAC patients, both LPI and phacoemulsification have been shown to be effective in controlling elevated IOP. Knowledge and information about changes in IOP after phacoemulsification and LPIin APAC patients, which is one of the criteria for successful APAC management, can be a reference as well as a consideration for choosing an effective treatment for APAC patients.Results: Of the 15 articles reviewed, 84% of patients who received phacoemulsification intervention experienced >50% reduction and 24.3% of patients experienced <50% decrease in post-op IOP compared with the mean pre-op IOP. While patients who received LPI intervention, 80.5% of patients experienced >50% reduction in IOP and 19.4% of patients experienced <50% reduction in IOP post-op compared with the mean pre-op IOP.Conclusion: There were decreases in IOP of APAC patients after phacoemulsification or LPI. In addition, there are differences in the decrease in IOP of APAC patients after phacoemulsification compared to LPI.Clinical Significance: Phacoemulsification and LPI are effective forlowering IOP in the early stages of an acute attack. LPIis the preferred procedure according to most guidelinesbecause it is relatively non-invasive, easy to administer on an outpatient basis, and has a lower risk of complications. Phacoemulsificatinhas been shown to be a more effective treatment than LPI for IOP reduction in early and medium-term IOP controls. Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Airlangga Article PeerReviewed text en https://repository.unair.ac.id/127022/1/6%20Artikel.pdf text id https://repository.unair.ac.id/127022/2/6%20KARIL.pdf text en https://repository.unair.ac.id/127022/3/6%20Turnitin.pdf Aulia Zinedinita Rahmasari, - and Nurwasis, - and Indri Wahyuni, Indri and Lilik Djuari, Lilik Comparison of Intraocular Pressure after Phacoemulsification Compared to Laser Peripheral Iridotomy (LPI) in Acute Primary Angle Closure (APAC) Patients: A Systematic Review. Journal of Current Medical Research and Opinion, 5 (12). pp. 1510-1519. ISSN 2589-8779 https://cmro.in/index.php/jcmro/article/view/587 https://doi.org/10.52845/CMRO/2022/5-12-3
institution Universitas Airlangga
building Universitas Airlangga Library
continent Asia
country Indonesia
Indonesia
content_provider Universitas Airlangga Library
collection UNAIR Repository
language English
Indonesian
English
topic R5-920 Medicine (General)
spellingShingle R5-920 Medicine (General)
Aulia Zinedinita Rahmasari, -
Nurwasis, -
Indri Wahyuni, Indri
Lilik Djuari, Lilik
Comparison of Intraocular Pressure after Phacoemulsification Compared to Laser Peripheral Iridotomy (LPI) in Acute Primary Angle Closure (APAC) Patients: A Systematic Review
description Abstract:Aim: To compare IOP in APAC patients after phacoemulsification compared to LPI.Background: Acute primary angle closure (APAC) is a type of PACG and an important cause of blindness in East Asia. In APAC patients, both LPI and phacoemulsification have been shown to be effective in controlling elevated IOP. Knowledge and information about changes in IOP after phacoemulsification and LPIin APAC patients, which is one of the criteria for successful APAC management, can be a reference as well as a consideration for choosing an effective treatment for APAC patients.Results: Of the 15 articles reviewed, 84% of patients who received phacoemulsification intervention experienced >50% reduction and 24.3% of patients experienced <50% decrease in post-op IOP compared with the mean pre-op IOP. While patients who received LPI intervention, 80.5% of patients experienced >50% reduction in IOP and 19.4% of patients experienced <50% reduction in IOP post-op compared with the mean pre-op IOP.Conclusion: There were decreases in IOP of APAC patients after phacoemulsification or LPI. In addition, there are differences in the decrease in IOP of APAC patients after phacoemulsification compared to LPI.Clinical Significance: Phacoemulsification and LPI are effective forlowering IOP in the early stages of an acute attack. LPIis the preferred procedure according to most guidelinesbecause it is relatively non-invasive, easy to administer on an outpatient basis, and has a lower risk of complications. Phacoemulsificatinhas been shown to be a more effective treatment than LPI for IOP reduction in early and medium-term IOP controls.
format Article
PeerReviewed
author Aulia Zinedinita Rahmasari, -
Nurwasis, -
Indri Wahyuni, Indri
Lilik Djuari, Lilik
author_facet Aulia Zinedinita Rahmasari, -
Nurwasis, -
Indri Wahyuni, Indri
Lilik Djuari, Lilik
author_sort Aulia Zinedinita Rahmasari, -
title Comparison of Intraocular Pressure after Phacoemulsification Compared to Laser Peripheral Iridotomy (LPI) in Acute Primary Angle Closure (APAC) Patients: A Systematic Review
title_short Comparison of Intraocular Pressure after Phacoemulsification Compared to Laser Peripheral Iridotomy (LPI) in Acute Primary Angle Closure (APAC) Patients: A Systematic Review
title_full Comparison of Intraocular Pressure after Phacoemulsification Compared to Laser Peripheral Iridotomy (LPI) in Acute Primary Angle Closure (APAC) Patients: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Comparison of Intraocular Pressure after Phacoemulsification Compared to Laser Peripheral Iridotomy (LPI) in Acute Primary Angle Closure (APAC) Patients: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Intraocular Pressure after Phacoemulsification Compared to Laser Peripheral Iridotomy (LPI) in Acute Primary Angle Closure (APAC) Patients: A Systematic Review
title_sort comparison of intraocular pressure after phacoemulsification compared to laser peripheral iridotomy (lpi) in acute primary angle closure (apac) patients: a systematic review
publisher Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Airlangga
url https://repository.unair.ac.id/127022/1/6%20Artikel.pdf
https://repository.unair.ac.id/127022/2/6%20KARIL.pdf
https://repository.unair.ac.id/127022/3/6%20Turnitin.pdf
https://repository.unair.ac.id/127022/
https://cmro.in/index.php/jcmro/article/view/587
https://doi.org/10.52845/CMRO/2022/5-12-3
_version_ 1769840047481159680