A demographic profile of cervical injury: an Indonesian single tertiary hospital study with 6 months to 1-year follow-up

• Main Authors: Lukas Widhiyanto, LUK, Aliefio Japamadisaw, LIF, Kukuh Dwiputra Hernugrahanto, KUH
• Format: Article PeerReviewed
• Language: English; English; English; Indonesian
• Published: Springer Nature 2021
• Subjects: RD701-811 Orthopedic surgery
• Online Access: https://repository.unair.ac.id/133454/6/1.%20Artikel%20Lukas%20Widhiyanto.pdf; https://repository.unair.ac.id/133454/2/2.%20Bukti%20Korespondensi%20Lukas%20Widhiyanto.pdf; https://repository.unair.ac.id/133454/3/3.%20Turnitin%20Lukas%20Widhiyanto.pdf; https://repository.unair.ac.id/133454/5/5.%20Kualitas%20Karil%20Lukas%20Widhiyanto.pdf; https://repository.unair.ac.id/133454/; https://ejnpn.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41983-021-00433-x; https://doi.org/10.1186/s41983-021-00433-x
• Institution: Universitas Airlangga

Background Spinal cord injury (SCI) can cause considerable morbidity and mortality. Until now there is no spinal cord injury profile in Indonesia. Therefore, this study aims to provide an overview of the spinal cord injury profile as well as to analyze the functional outcome at the sixth month and the first year. Results Most spinal cord injury cases were traumatic SCI (67.5%). Meanwhile, non-traumatic SCI was 32.5%. The mean age of patients who had traumatic SCI was 41.9 ± 17.4 years while non-traumatic SCI patients was 48.4 ± 13.7 with a significant difference (p < 0.05). Most cases occurred in men rather than women with significant differences based on the type of injury (p < 0.05). Traffic accidents were the most common cause of cervical injuries (47.1%). Surgery was the most common treatment modality in cervical injury cases (60.4%) with the posterior approach being the preferred approach in most operative measures (72.4%). Respiratory failure was the leading cause of death (48.9%). The mean LOS of patients with traumatic SCI was 28.8 ± 14.3 days while the mean LOS of non-traumatic SCI patients was 44.7 ± 28.7 with a significant difference (p < 0.05). There was significance difference between the initial outcome and after the sixth month to first year follow-up (p < 0.05). Conclusions This study demonstrated the epidemiology and characteristics of spinal cord injury which mostly had a good neurological outcome.