Prinsip Audi et Alteram Partem dalam Perkara Perdata di Peradilan Umum

The Law of Judicial Power has not regulated the legal principles of Audi et Alteram Partem, while the rules in HIR are still vague or blurred. The dissertation research focused on three issues: The philosophical basic of Audi et alteram partem principle; Characteristics of civil cases and their r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dwi Handayani, 031317017312
Format: Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed
Language:English
English
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://repository.unair.ac.id/66697/1/abstrak.pdf
http://repository.unair.ac.id/66697/2/DWI%20HANDAYANI%20%E2%80%93%20031317017312%20-%20DISERTASI.pdf
http://repository.unair.ac.id/66697/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universitas Airlangga
Language: English
English
id id-langga.66697
record_format dspace
spelling id-langga.666972017-11-15T19:49:40Z http://repository.unair.ac.id/66697/ Prinsip Audi et Alteram Partem dalam Perkara Perdata di Peradilan Umum Dwi Handayani, 031317017312 K Law The Law of Judicial Power has not regulated the legal principles of Audi et Alteram Partem, while the rules in HIR are still vague or blurred. The dissertation research focused on three issues: The philosophical basic of Audi et alteram partem principle; Characteristics of civil cases and their relation of decisions based on Audi et alteram partem; and Ratio decidendi judge decision on the application of Audi et alteram partem. The research approach is: Statutory Approach; Conceptual Approach; Case Approach; and Comparative Approach.This research concluded that: first, the principle of Audi et alteram Partem means "hear both side " or “ hear the other side”, which is "equality of balance" and "equality of opportunity" of parties in the judicial process, reflected "justice" and the background of a decision that waives the principle of law and “equality before the law”. The principle of Audi et alteram Partem is different from Equality before the Law. Second, characteristic types of civil litigation lawsuits, general and special nature and processed through contentious judicial. The trial process ended with a decision based on Audi et Alteram Partem, with the characteristic of a legal effort. Third, the basis for deciding the case contained in the legal considerations (Ratio decidendi). Sources of judgment considerations include: material aspects of the case; formal aspects; principles of law and custom in the judiciary. In Ratio decidendi, new rules are developed and established when the formal aspects of the case do not exist and judges are required to seek and extract from the habits in society and apply the principles of law as the basis of the philosophy of the decision based on Audi et Alteram Partem 2017-11-16 Thesis NonPeerReviewed text en http://repository.unair.ac.id/66697/1/abstrak.pdf text en http://repository.unair.ac.id/66697/2/DWI%20HANDAYANI%20%E2%80%93%20031317017312%20-%20DISERTASI.pdf Dwi Handayani, 031317017312 (2017) Prinsip Audi et Alteram Partem dalam Perkara Perdata di Peradilan Umum. Disertasi thesis, Universitas Airlangga.
institution Universitas Airlangga
building Universitas Airlangga Library
country Indonesia
collection UNAIR Repository
language English
English
topic K Law
spellingShingle K Law
Dwi Handayani, 031317017312
Prinsip Audi et Alteram Partem dalam Perkara Perdata di Peradilan Umum
description The Law of Judicial Power has not regulated the legal principles of Audi et Alteram Partem, while the rules in HIR are still vague or blurred. The dissertation research focused on three issues: The philosophical basic of Audi et alteram partem principle; Characteristics of civil cases and their relation of decisions based on Audi et alteram partem; and Ratio decidendi judge decision on the application of Audi et alteram partem. The research approach is: Statutory Approach; Conceptual Approach; Case Approach; and Comparative Approach.This research concluded that: first, the principle of Audi et alteram Partem means "hear both side " or “ hear the other side”, which is "equality of balance" and "equality of opportunity" of parties in the judicial process, reflected "justice" and the background of a decision that waives the principle of law and “equality before the law”. The principle of Audi et alteram Partem is different from Equality before the Law. Second, characteristic types of civil litigation lawsuits, general and special nature and processed through contentious judicial. The trial process ended with a decision based on Audi et Alteram Partem, with the characteristic of a legal effort. Third, the basis for deciding the case contained in the legal considerations (Ratio decidendi). Sources of judgment considerations include: material aspects of the case; formal aspects; principles of law and custom in the judiciary. In Ratio decidendi, new rules are developed and established when the formal aspects of the case do not exist and judges are required to seek and extract from the habits in society and apply the principles of law as the basis of the philosophy of the decision based on Audi et Alteram Partem
format Theses and Dissertations
NonPeerReviewed
author Dwi Handayani, 031317017312
author_facet Dwi Handayani, 031317017312
author_sort Dwi Handayani, 031317017312
title Prinsip Audi et Alteram Partem dalam Perkara Perdata di Peradilan Umum
title_short Prinsip Audi et Alteram Partem dalam Perkara Perdata di Peradilan Umum
title_full Prinsip Audi et Alteram Partem dalam Perkara Perdata di Peradilan Umum
title_fullStr Prinsip Audi et Alteram Partem dalam Perkara Perdata di Peradilan Umum
title_full_unstemmed Prinsip Audi et Alteram Partem dalam Perkara Perdata di Peradilan Umum
title_sort prinsip audi et alteram partem dalam perkara perdata di peradilan umum
publishDate 2017
url http://repository.unair.ac.id/66697/1/abstrak.pdf
http://repository.unair.ac.id/66697/2/DWI%20HANDAYANI%20%E2%80%93%20031317017312%20-%20DISERTASI.pdf
http://repository.unair.ac.id/66697/
_version_ 1681149143712530432