ANALISIS EFISIENSI BIAYA PRODUKSI PETERNAKAN ITIK PEDAGING HIBRIDA DAN ITIK PEDAGING MOJOSARI DI KECAMATAN PUNGGING KABUPATEN MOJOKERTO PENELITIAN DESKRIPTIF
This research aims to determine the level of efficiency production cost of Hybrid duck and Mojosari duck farms in Pungging sub-district of Mojokerto district. Location and 20 respondents were determine based on purposive sampling method from the total of all farmers in Pungging sub-district of M...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
Language: | Indonesian Indonesian |
Published: |
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://repository.unair.ac.id/78164/1/TAV.%2016-18%20Adi%20a%20Abstrak.pdf http://repository.unair.ac.id/78164/2/TAV.%2016-18%20Adi%20a.pdf http://repository.unair.ac.id/78164/ http://lib.unair.ac.id |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universitas Airlangga |
Language: | Indonesian Indonesian |
Summary: | This research aims to determine the level of efficiency production cost of
Hybrid duck and Mojosari duck farms in Pungging sub-district of Mojokerto
district. Location and 20 respondents were determine based on purposive
sampling method from the total of all farmers in Pungging sub-district of
Mojokerto district. Data collection was done by questionnaire, interview and
documentation technique. The data of this research was analyze by Data
Envelopment Analysis (DEA) approach to measure the efficiency production cost
of duck farms used input variable that consist of the cost of cages, tools, shrinkage
of cages, shrinkage of tools, seeds, water & electricity, feeds, vitamin &
antibiotics and vaccines. Output variable was the revenue from the duck sale. The
results showed that the efficiency of production cost of Hybrid duck farms was
varies, farmers who achieve efficiency as 100% was 8 farmers or 80% of the total
respondents and 20% inefficient. Mojosari duck farms who achieved the same
level of efficiency as 100% was 8 farmers or 80% and the remaining 20% was inefficient. |
---|