The cleanliness differences of root canal walls after irrigated with East Java propolis extract and sodium hypoclorite solutions

Background: Root canal instrumentation produces smear layer that covers dentine tubules of the root canal surface. Smear layer is organic and inorganic particles that have to be removed. East Java propolis extracts contais of saponin components used as a natural surfactant. 2.5% NaOCl and 5% NaOCl s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tamara Yuanita, NIDN. 0025066005
Format: Article PeerReviewed
Language:Indonesian
English
English
Published: Faculty of Dental Medicine Universitas Airlangga 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://repository.unair.ac.id/84490/2/Tamara%20per%206.pdf
http://repository.unair.ac.id/84490/3/The%20cleanliness%20differences%20of%20root%20canal%20walls%20after%20irrigated%20with%20East%20Java%20propolis%20extract%20and%20sodium%20hypoclorite%20solutions.pdf
http://repository.unair.ac.id/84490/5/3573-12501-4-PB.pdf
http://repository.unair.ac.id/84490/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universitas Airlangga
Language: Indonesian
English
English
id id-langga.84490
record_format dspace
spelling id-langga.844902019-07-18T05:17:16Z http://repository.unair.ac.id/84490/ The cleanliness differences of root canal walls after irrigated with East Java propolis extract and sodium hypoclorite solutions Tamara Yuanita, NIDN. 0025066005 R Medicine RK Dentistry Background: Root canal instrumentation produces smear layer that covers dentine tubules of the root canal surface. Smear layer is organic and inorganic particles that have to be removed. East Java propolis extracts contais of saponin components used as a natural surfactant. 2.5% NaOCl and 5% NaOCl solutions have been widely used for irrigation in root canal treatment. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze the cleanliness of the root canal walls, irrigated with aquadest, 8% East Java propolis extract, 2.5% NaOCl and 5% NaOCl. Method: Forty extracted teeth with straight single root canals were randomly divided into four groups (n=10). The specimens were prepared with ProTaper. During instrumentation, the root canals were irrigated with different solutions: Control Group irrigated with aquadest; Group 1 irrigated with 8% East Java propolis extract; Group 2 irrigated with 2.5% NaOCl and Group 3 irrigated with 5% NaOCl. The root canals were cut at apical third and SEM scores were tested by using Mann-Whitney test at the significance level of p=0.05 and Median Control test. Result: The results of Mann-Whitney Test, there were significant differences between control group with Group 1, 2 and 3 (p<0.05). Based on the Median Control test, the value of 8% East Java propolis extracts was 1,000, which was the best value compared to 2.5% NaOCl, 5% NaOCl and aquadest. Conclusion: It can be concluded that 8% East Java propolis extract is the most effective solution for cleaning root canal walls compared with 2.5% NaOCl and 5% NaOCl. Faculty of Dental Medicine Universitas Airlangga 2017 Article PeerReviewed text id http://repository.unair.ac.id/84490/2/Tamara%20per%206.pdf text en http://repository.unair.ac.id/84490/3/The%20cleanliness%20differences%20of%20root%20canal%20walls%20after%20irrigated%20with%20East%20Java%20propolis%20extract%20and%20sodium%20hypoclorite%20solutions.pdf text en http://repository.unair.ac.id/84490/5/3573-12501-4-PB.pdf Tamara Yuanita, NIDN. 0025066005 (2017) The cleanliness differences of root canal walls after irrigated with East Java propolis extract and sodium hypoclorite solutions. Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi), 50 (1). pp. 6-10. ISSN 1978-3728, e 2442-9740
institution Universitas Airlangga
building Universitas Airlangga Library
country Indonesia
collection UNAIR Repository
language Indonesian
English
English
topic R Medicine
RK Dentistry
spellingShingle R Medicine
RK Dentistry
Tamara Yuanita, NIDN. 0025066005
The cleanliness differences of root canal walls after irrigated with East Java propolis extract and sodium hypoclorite solutions
description Background: Root canal instrumentation produces smear layer that covers dentine tubules of the root canal surface. Smear layer is organic and inorganic particles that have to be removed. East Java propolis extracts contais of saponin components used as a natural surfactant. 2.5% NaOCl and 5% NaOCl solutions have been widely used for irrigation in root canal treatment. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze the cleanliness of the root canal walls, irrigated with aquadest, 8% East Java propolis extract, 2.5% NaOCl and 5% NaOCl. Method: Forty extracted teeth with straight single root canals were randomly divided into four groups (n=10). The specimens were prepared with ProTaper. During instrumentation, the root canals were irrigated with different solutions: Control Group irrigated with aquadest; Group 1 irrigated with 8% East Java propolis extract; Group 2 irrigated with 2.5% NaOCl and Group 3 irrigated with 5% NaOCl. The root canals were cut at apical third and SEM scores were tested by using Mann-Whitney test at the significance level of p=0.05 and Median Control test. Result: The results of Mann-Whitney Test, there were significant differences between control group with Group 1, 2 and 3 (p<0.05). Based on the Median Control test, the value of 8% East Java propolis extracts was 1,000, which was the best value compared to 2.5% NaOCl, 5% NaOCl and aquadest. Conclusion: It can be concluded that 8% East Java propolis extract is the most effective solution for cleaning root canal walls compared with 2.5% NaOCl and 5% NaOCl.
format Article
PeerReviewed
author Tamara Yuanita, NIDN. 0025066005
author_facet Tamara Yuanita, NIDN. 0025066005
author_sort Tamara Yuanita, NIDN. 0025066005
title The cleanliness differences of root canal walls after irrigated with East Java propolis extract and sodium hypoclorite solutions
title_short The cleanliness differences of root canal walls after irrigated with East Java propolis extract and sodium hypoclorite solutions
title_full The cleanliness differences of root canal walls after irrigated with East Java propolis extract and sodium hypoclorite solutions
title_fullStr The cleanliness differences of root canal walls after irrigated with East Java propolis extract and sodium hypoclorite solutions
title_full_unstemmed The cleanliness differences of root canal walls after irrigated with East Java propolis extract and sodium hypoclorite solutions
title_sort cleanliness differences of root canal walls after irrigated with east java propolis extract and sodium hypoclorite solutions
publisher Faculty of Dental Medicine Universitas Airlangga
publishDate 2017
url http://repository.unair.ac.id/84490/2/Tamara%20per%206.pdf
http://repository.unair.ac.id/84490/3/The%20cleanliness%20differences%20of%20root%20canal%20walls%20after%20irrigated%20with%20East%20Java%20propolis%20extract%20and%20sodium%20hypoclorite%20solutions.pdf
http://repository.unair.ac.id/84490/5/3573-12501-4-PB.pdf
http://repository.unair.ac.id/84490/
_version_ 1681151904604749824