Perbedaan Angka Kejadian Fistel Uretrokutan pada Penggunaan Kateter Uretra dan Kateter Suprapubik dengan Stent Setelah Operasi Hipospadia

• Main Authors: Yacobda H. Sigumonrong, Adi Santoso, Tarmono Djojodimedjo, Widodo Jatim Pudjirahardjo
• Format: Article PeerReviewed
• Language: English; English; English
• Published: The Indonesian Urological Association 2009
• Subjects: R Medicine (General); RD Surgery
• Online Access: http://repository.unair.ac.id/95436/1/Perbedaan%20Angka%20Kejadian%20Fistel.pdf; http://repository.unair.ac.id/95436/2/Perbedaan%20Angka%20Kejadian%20Fistel%20Uretrokutan_compressed.pdf; http://repository.unair.ac.id/95436/3/Perbedaan%20Angka%20Kejadian%20Fistel%20Uretrokutan%20pada%20Penggunaan%20Kateter%20Uretra%20dan%20Kateter%20Suprapubik%20dengan%20Stent%20Setelah%20Operasi%20Hipospadia.pdf; http://repository.unair.ac.id/95436/; http://juri.urologi.or.id/juri/article/view/338; https://doi.org/10.32421/juri.v16i2.338
• Institution: Universitas Airlangga

Objectives: To study rate of urethrocutaneous fistula formation associated with usage of indwelling urethral catheter compared to suprapubic catheter with stent after hypospadias repair. Materials and methods: Twenty patients with primary hypospadias of penile shaft and posterior type underwent reconstruction with onlay technique by a single operator. Urinary diversion in 10 patients utilised a urethral catheter, while the remainder used a silicone suprapubic catheter with stent. Results: Seven urethrocutaneous fistula were observed (35%) with 4 fistulas in the group with suprapubic catheter and stent, and 3 fistulas in the group with urethral catheters. Fisher exact test value was 0,001 with significance level of 1,000 (p>0,05). Conclusion: There was no difference in rate of urethrocutaneous fistula with use of urethral catheter and suprapubic catheterisation with stent after hypospadias repair.