Comparison Study of Urinary Retention Incidence in Assisted Vaginal Delivery Case with and without 24-Hour Catheterization

• Main Authors: Eighty Mardiyan Kurniawati, Hari Parathon, Suskhan Djusad, Fernandy Moegini, Junizal, Budi Iman Santoso
• Format: Article PeerReviewed
• Language: English; English; English
• Published: Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology 2020
• Subjects: R Medicine (General); RG Gynecology and obstetrics
• Online Access: http://repository.unair.ac.id/96266/1/Comparison%20Study%20of_compressed.pdf; http://repository.unair.ac.id/96266/2/Comparison%20Study%20of%20Urinary.pdf; http://repository.unair.ac.id/96266/3/Comparison%20Study%20of%20Urinary%20Retention%20Incidence%20in%20Assisted%20Vaginal%20Delivery%20Case%20with%20and%20without%2024-hour%20catheterization.pdf; http://repository.unair.ac.id/96266/; http://www.ijfmt.com/issues.html
• Institution: Universitas Airlangga

Background: Urinary retention is a condition commonly seen after vaginal delivery, especially in the highrisk cases, such as assisted vaginal delivery, grade 3-4 th perineal rupture, or another high risk. Urinary retention caused by unsynchronized between the contraction of the bladder detrusor. Urinary catheterization is one of the preventions of urinary retention. It gives a time for perineal trauma to relieve and no longer edema, so that urethra can be fully relaxed. Therefore, 24-hour catheterization expected to prevent bladder overdistention. It also prevents the bladder from becoming atonia. Objective: This research aims to study the incidence of urinary retention in assisted vaginal delivery with and without 24-hour catheterization. Method: This study used randomized control trials that compared two groups with 24hour catheterization and without 24-hour catheterization. This study was conducted on 40 women in each group who experienced assisted vaginal birth at Dr Soetomo Hospital, Indonesia. Result: Six women (15%) experienced urinary retention with 24-hour catheterization and six women (15%) had urinary retention without catheterization. There was no significant difference in the incidence of urinary retention with 24-hour catheterization and without 24-hour catheterization (p-value = 1.00). Also, there was no significant interference of urinary retention in the normal and prolonged second stage of labor (p-value = 0.736), and there was no significant risk factor contributing to urinary retention. Conclusion: No significant difference in urinary retention occurred in assisted vaginal delivery with and without 24-hour catheterization.