Perbandingan Akurasi Rumus Risanto dan Rumus Johnson dalam Menentukan Taksiran Berat Janin Berdasarkan Tinggi Fundus Uterus

Background: Estimated fetal weight (EFW) is used as a guidence for management of labor. Several methods are used including ultrasound and fundal height measurements. The usual method is using Johnson�s formula but Risanto�s formula is now developing. Objective: To compare the accuracy of Risanto...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: , RR. Hanifah Intan Titisari, , dr. H. Risanto Siswosudarmo, SpOG(K)
Format: Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed
Published: [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2013
Subjects:
ETD
Online Access:https://repository.ugm.ac.id/118473/
http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=58440
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universitas Gadjah Mada
id id-ugm-repo.118473
record_format dspace
spelling id-ugm-repo.1184732016-03-04T08:42:38Z https://repository.ugm.ac.id/118473/ Perbandingan Akurasi Rumus Risanto dan Rumus Johnson dalam Menentukan Taksiran Berat Janin Berdasarkan Tinggi Fundus Uterus , RR. Hanifah Intan Titisari , dr. H. Risanto Siswosudarmo, SpOG(K) ETD Background: Estimated fetal weight (EFW) is used as a guidence for management of labor. Several methods are used including ultrasound and fundal height measurements. The usual method is using Johnson�s formula but Risanto�s formula is now developing. Objective: To compare the accuracy of Risanto�s and Johnson�s formulas in determining estimated fetal weight. Design and method: This is a cross sectional study. Six hundred and sixty five pregnant women from Sardjito and affiliated hospital between 37-42 weeks of gestation are used. Fundal height is measured from the symphisis to the top of uterine fundus, using inverted unelastic flexible tape. EFW based on Risanto�s and Johnson�s formulas are compared with the actual birth weight. Wilcoxon analysis is used for statistic analysis. Result: Mean EFW Risanto is 3056 ± 322.5 grams and EFW Johnson is 3136 ± 392.2 grams and mean birth weight is 3021 ± 341.1 grams. The mean difference between EFW Risanto and birth weight is 100.8±86.1 grams and mean difference between EFW Johnson and actual birth weight is 156.1±107.3 grams. The difference bethween delta EFW Risanto�s and EFW Johnson�s is statistically significant (p=0,001). Conclusion: This study shows that Risanto�s formula is more accurate than Johnson�s. [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2013 Thesis NonPeerReviewed , RR. Hanifah Intan Titisari and , dr. H. Risanto Siswosudarmo, SpOG(K) (2013) Perbandingan Akurasi Rumus Risanto dan Rumus Johnson dalam Menentukan Taksiran Berat Janin Berdasarkan Tinggi Fundus Uterus. UNSPECIFIED thesis, UNSPECIFIED. http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=58440
institution Universitas Gadjah Mada
building UGM Library
country Indonesia
collection Repository Civitas UGM
topic ETD
spellingShingle ETD
, RR. Hanifah Intan Titisari
, dr. H. Risanto Siswosudarmo, SpOG(K)
Perbandingan Akurasi Rumus Risanto dan Rumus Johnson dalam Menentukan Taksiran Berat Janin Berdasarkan Tinggi Fundus Uterus
description Background: Estimated fetal weight (EFW) is used as a guidence for management of labor. Several methods are used including ultrasound and fundal height measurements. The usual method is using Johnson�s formula but Risanto�s formula is now developing. Objective: To compare the accuracy of Risanto�s and Johnson�s formulas in determining estimated fetal weight. Design and method: This is a cross sectional study. Six hundred and sixty five pregnant women from Sardjito and affiliated hospital between 37-42 weeks of gestation are used. Fundal height is measured from the symphisis to the top of uterine fundus, using inverted unelastic flexible tape. EFW based on Risanto�s and Johnson�s formulas are compared with the actual birth weight. Wilcoxon analysis is used for statistic analysis. Result: Mean EFW Risanto is 3056 ± 322.5 grams and EFW Johnson is 3136 ± 392.2 grams and mean birth weight is 3021 ± 341.1 grams. The mean difference between EFW Risanto and birth weight is 100.8±86.1 grams and mean difference between EFW Johnson and actual birth weight is 156.1±107.3 grams. The difference bethween delta EFW Risanto�s and EFW Johnson�s is statistically significant (p=0,001). Conclusion: This study shows that Risanto�s formula is more accurate than Johnson�s.
format Theses and Dissertations
NonPeerReviewed
author , RR. Hanifah Intan Titisari
, dr. H. Risanto Siswosudarmo, SpOG(K)
author_facet , RR. Hanifah Intan Titisari
, dr. H. Risanto Siswosudarmo, SpOG(K)
author_sort , RR. Hanifah Intan Titisari
title Perbandingan Akurasi Rumus Risanto dan Rumus Johnson dalam Menentukan Taksiran Berat Janin Berdasarkan Tinggi Fundus Uterus
title_short Perbandingan Akurasi Rumus Risanto dan Rumus Johnson dalam Menentukan Taksiran Berat Janin Berdasarkan Tinggi Fundus Uterus
title_full Perbandingan Akurasi Rumus Risanto dan Rumus Johnson dalam Menentukan Taksiran Berat Janin Berdasarkan Tinggi Fundus Uterus
title_fullStr Perbandingan Akurasi Rumus Risanto dan Rumus Johnson dalam Menentukan Taksiran Berat Janin Berdasarkan Tinggi Fundus Uterus
title_full_unstemmed Perbandingan Akurasi Rumus Risanto dan Rumus Johnson dalam Menentukan Taksiran Berat Janin Berdasarkan Tinggi Fundus Uterus
title_sort perbandingan akurasi rumus risanto dan rumus johnson dalam menentukan taksiran berat janin berdasarkan tinggi fundus uterus
publisher [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
publishDate 2013
url https://repository.ugm.ac.id/118473/
http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=58440
_version_ 1681230966771679232