Perbandingan Akurasi Rumus Risanto dan Rumus Johnson dalam Menentukan Taksiran Berat Janin Berdasarkan Tinggi Fundus Uterus
Background: Estimated fetal weight (EFW) is used as a guidence for management of labor. Several methods are used including ultrasound and fundal height measurements. The usual method is using Johnson�s formula but Risanto�s formula is now developing. Objective: To compare the accuracy of Risanto...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
Published: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://repository.ugm.ac.id/118473/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=58440 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universitas Gadjah Mada |
id |
id-ugm-repo.118473 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
id-ugm-repo.1184732016-03-04T08:42:38Z https://repository.ugm.ac.id/118473/ Perbandingan Akurasi Rumus Risanto dan Rumus Johnson dalam Menentukan Taksiran Berat Janin Berdasarkan Tinggi Fundus Uterus , RR. Hanifah Intan Titisari , dr. H. Risanto Siswosudarmo, SpOG(K) ETD Background: Estimated fetal weight (EFW) is used as a guidence for management of labor. Several methods are used including ultrasound and fundal height measurements. The usual method is using Johnson�s formula but Risanto�s formula is now developing. Objective: To compare the accuracy of Risanto�s and Johnson�s formulas in determining estimated fetal weight. Design and method: This is a cross sectional study. Six hundred and sixty five pregnant women from Sardjito and affiliated hospital between 37-42 weeks of gestation are used. Fundal height is measured from the symphisis to the top of uterine fundus, using inverted unelastic flexible tape. EFW based on Risanto�s and Johnson�s formulas are compared with the actual birth weight. Wilcoxon analysis is used for statistic analysis. Result: Mean EFW Risanto is 3056 ± 322.5 grams and EFW Johnson is 3136 ± 392.2 grams and mean birth weight is 3021 ± 341.1 grams. The mean difference between EFW Risanto and birth weight is 100.8±86.1 grams and mean difference between EFW Johnson and actual birth weight is 156.1±107.3 grams. The difference bethween delta EFW Risanto�s and EFW Johnson�s is statistically significant (p=0,001). Conclusion: This study shows that Risanto�s formula is more accurate than Johnson�s. [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2013 Thesis NonPeerReviewed , RR. Hanifah Intan Titisari and , dr. H. Risanto Siswosudarmo, SpOG(K) (2013) Perbandingan Akurasi Rumus Risanto dan Rumus Johnson dalam Menentukan Taksiran Berat Janin Berdasarkan Tinggi Fundus Uterus. UNSPECIFIED thesis, UNSPECIFIED. http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=58440 |
institution |
Universitas Gadjah Mada |
building |
UGM Library |
country |
Indonesia |
collection |
Repository Civitas UGM |
topic |
ETD |
spellingShingle |
ETD , RR. Hanifah Intan Titisari , dr. H. Risanto Siswosudarmo, SpOG(K) Perbandingan Akurasi Rumus Risanto dan Rumus Johnson dalam Menentukan Taksiran Berat Janin Berdasarkan Tinggi Fundus Uterus |
description |
Background: Estimated fetal weight (EFW) is used as a guidence for management of labor. Several methods are used including ultrasound and fundal height measurements. The usual method is using Johnson�s formula but Risanto�s formula is now developing.
Objective: To compare the accuracy of Risanto�s and Johnson�s formulas in determining estimated fetal weight.
Design and method: This is a cross sectional study. Six hundred and sixty five pregnant women from Sardjito and affiliated hospital between 37-42 weeks of gestation are used. Fundal height is measured from the symphisis to the top of uterine fundus, using inverted unelastic flexible tape. EFW based on Risanto�s and Johnson�s formulas are compared with the actual birth weight. Wilcoxon analysis is used for statistic analysis.
Result: Mean EFW Risanto is 3056 ± 322.5 grams and EFW Johnson is 3136 ± 392.2 grams and mean birth weight is 3021 ± 341.1 grams. The mean difference between EFW Risanto and birth weight is 100.8±86.1 grams and mean difference between EFW Johnson and actual birth weight is 156.1±107.3 grams. The difference bethween delta EFW Risanto�s and EFW Johnson�s is statistically significant (p=0,001).
Conclusion: This study shows that Risanto�s formula is more accurate than Johnson�s. |
format |
Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
author |
, RR. Hanifah Intan Titisari , dr. H. Risanto Siswosudarmo, SpOG(K) |
author_facet |
, RR. Hanifah Intan Titisari , dr. H. Risanto Siswosudarmo, SpOG(K) |
author_sort |
, RR. Hanifah Intan Titisari |
title |
Perbandingan Akurasi Rumus Risanto dan Rumus Johnson dalam Menentukan Taksiran Berat Janin Berdasarkan Tinggi Fundus Uterus |
title_short |
Perbandingan Akurasi Rumus Risanto dan Rumus Johnson dalam Menentukan Taksiran Berat Janin Berdasarkan Tinggi Fundus Uterus |
title_full |
Perbandingan Akurasi Rumus Risanto dan Rumus Johnson dalam Menentukan Taksiran Berat Janin Berdasarkan Tinggi Fundus Uterus |
title_fullStr |
Perbandingan Akurasi Rumus Risanto dan Rumus Johnson dalam Menentukan Taksiran Berat Janin Berdasarkan Tinggi Fundus Uterus |
title_full_unstemmed |
Perbandingan Akurasi Rumus Risanto dan Rumus Johnson dalam Menentukan Taksiran Berat Janin Berdasarkan Tinggi Fundus Uterus |
title_sort |
perbandingan akurasi rumus risanto dan rumus johnson dalam menentukan taksiran berat janin berdasarkan tinggi fundus uterus |
publisher |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada |
publishDate |
2013 |
url |
https://repository.ugm.ac.id/118473/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=58440 |
_version_ |
1681230966771679232 |