VALIDITAS KLINIK GENERAL HEALTH QUESTIONNAIRE-12 SEBAGAI INSTRUMEN SKRINING GANGGUAN PENYESUAIAN
Adjustment Disorder (AD) is a common mental health problem in primary health center. This study aimed to adapt and examine the clinical validity of GHQ-12 as Adjustment Disorder screening instrument in Puskesmas. Structured Clinical Interview Diagnosis (SCID) based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manu...
محفوظ في:
المؤلفون الرئيسيون: | , |
---|---|
التنسيق: | Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
منشور في: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2013
|
الموضوعات: | |
الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | https://repository.ugm.ac.id/118636/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=58610 |
الوسوم: |
إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
|
الملخص: | Adjustment Disorder (AD) is a common mental health problem in primary health
center. This study aimed to adapt and examine the clinical validity of GHQ-12 as
Adjustment Disorder screening instrument in Puskesmas. Structured Clinical
Interview Diagnosis (SCID) based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental
Disorder (DSM) IV was used as a gold standard to which questionnaire was
compared. The subjects were 250 adult outpatients from twenty five community
health center (Puskesmas) in Sleman, Yogyakarta. Alpha Cronbach, Principal
Component Analysis, dan Pearson Corelation were conducted to assess the
psychometric properties. Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) dan Likelihood Ratio
(LR) were conducted to assess the clinical validity. The prevalence of AD was
17.3%. A cronbach�s Alpha of .863 (likert�s scoring method), .841 (bimodal�s
scoring method), .832 (CGHQ�s scoring method), a Pearson�s correlations of .397
(bimodal�s), .370 (likert�s), .402 (CGHQ�s), p<0.001). and a 3-factor structure,
which are psychological distres, successful coping, and full of enjoyment were
obtained, Sensitivity and specivity for GHQ-12 were .81 and .62 (for the optimum
cut-off point �11 in Likert�s scoring method), .81 and .57 (for the optimum cut-off
point �2 in bimodal�s scoring method), .81 and .55 (for the optimum cut-off point �4
in CGHQ�s scoring method). Positive Likelihood Ratio and negative Likelihood
Ratio for GHQ-12 were 2.12 and 0.31 (Likert�s scoring method), 1.90 and 0.34
(Bimodal�s scoring method), and 1.80 and 0.35 (CGHQ�s scoring method). The
GHQ-12 is valid, reliable, and accurate in Puskesmas population, and can be
employed as a screening instrumen in this population. |
---|