PERBANDINGAN DAYA GUNA AUTO KO-INDUKSI PROPOFOL 0,25 MG/KGBB DENGAN 0,5 MG/KGBB DALAM MENGURANGI DOSIS INDUKSI PROPOFOL PADA OPERASI ELEKTIF DENGAN ANESTESI UMUM
Background : propofol when used as the sole induction causes a decrease in arterial blood pressure and cardiac output were significant, rapid intravenous administration resulted in a temporary stop breathing due to depression of ventilation. To get the minimal side effects and cost effective, it is...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
Published: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://repository.ugm.ac.id/120567/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=60603 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universitas Gadjah Mada |
Summary: | Background : propofol when used as the sole induction causes a decrease in
arterial blood pressure and cardiac output were significant, rapid intravenous
administration resulted in a temporary stop breathing due to depression of ventilation. To
get the minimal side effects and cost effective, it is necessary to auto co-induction.
Objective : this study was aimed to know that the power to auto co-induction of
propofol 0.25 mg/kg intravenously with propofol auto-co-induction 0.5 mg/kg
intravenously induction dose of propofol in reducing the elective surgery with general
anesthesia.
Method : the used method was a double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT).
The subjects were 90 patients and divided in two groups, which were group A is a group
that gets auto propofol co-induction of 0.25 mg/bw intravenously and group B is group
that get auto co-induction of propofol 0.5 mg/bw intravenously were included in the
inclusion criteria. Measurements performed on patient demographics: age, sex, weight,
height, BMI (Body Mass Index), physical status (ASA) and the initial hemodynamic
(systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial blood pressure and pulse
heart). The next recording is an induction dose of propofol, after induction and
hemodynamic side effects occur. The data ware analyzed using independent t-test and
chi-square (p<0.05).
Result : there was a significant difference in the matter of induction dosage which
needed on both groups, which as much as 16,13 mg (p=0,001) whilst in Group A
(119,5911 ± 12,24973) and Group B (135,7222 ± 12,93408), so as 0,25 mg/bw propofol
auto co-induction administration had more potency with 0,5 mg/bw dosage in order to
decreasing propofol induction dosage. IoC mark which resulted after one minute of coinduction
auto dosage had showed (81,69 ± 2,26) in Group A and (80,84 ± 1,99) for
Group B whereas these results implified the non significant difference (p=0,063).
Hemodynamic changes measured before the auto co-induction and after the induction of
propofol on both groups still within in safe boundaries and had not showed the significant
difference (p>0,05).
Conclusion : auto co induction with propofol 0,25mg/bw intravenously has a
better potency than propofol 0,5 mg/bw intravenously in order to reduce the propofol
total induction dosage in elective surgeries with general anesthesia and its propofol
differential dosage need of 16,13 mg (p = 0,001). |
---|