PERBANDINGAN METODE PEMBELAJARAN DEMONSTRASI DAN COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING PADA PENGUKURAN TEKANAN DARAH DI SEKOLAH TINGGI ILMU KESEHATAN GUNA BANGSA YOGYAKARTA

• Main Authors: , NUR YETI SYARIFAH, , Prof. Dr. Amitya Kumara, M.S.
• Format: Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed
• Published: [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2013
• Subjects: ETD
• Online Access: https://repository.ugm.ac.id/120583/; http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=60620
• Institution: Universitas Gadjah Mada

Rationale: Learning methods in education, suggestion a lecturer not only using one method but also is expected to provide better learning outcomes for the purpose, and effectiveness of the learning process can be achieved by learners. Limitations in the process of self-learning students, limitations available the number of nursing lecturer is still minimal and 80 percentage were permit learning master degree, limitation of learning time and guidance for student can be give impact on learning outcomes. Nurse is a professional who is spearheading the health services are required to have the intellectual ability, interpersonal, technical ability, and moral, that are expected to provide a baseline examination vital signs (Blood Pressure Measurement) as the data supporting enforcement of diagnosis and therapy treatment, which if one was going to be fatal, so it is not unethical if let patients ill from students who have not handled by skilled. Objective: Measuring and comparing study result of the students knowledge, effectiveness and skills) after attending one of methods of learning of demonstrative and CAL on blood pressure measurement. Method: The methodology of this research is an experimental research in education. The research samples consist of 76 undergraduates of nursing science which are divided into two groups. This research uses experimental type control time series design which determines the level of the learning skill achieved on measuring the blood pressure, after the students followed demonstrative method of learning and computer assisted learning. The samples are randomized using kind of simple random sampling, which draws members of the population (lottery technique). The instruments used are multiple Choice Question, Checklist and Observation Sheets. The data acquired will be processed and compared using independent t test. Results: Statistically, there are significant differences on the results of Students attending methods of learning of demonstrative and CAL on blood pressure measurement. Comparison results of measuring the effectiveness of learning using those methods shows that computer assisted learning method resulting in higher mean than the demonstrative method. But, the differences in statistics will not have significant meaning. Conclusion: Demonstrative and Computer Assisted Learning Methods are effective learning methods. They could be used to improve the students� knowledge and skills when well applied.