PENAWARAN PEMBAYARAN TUNAI DAN PENITIPAN UANG DALAM PERSELISIHAN HUBUNGAN INDUSTRIAL

• Main Authors: , YUNI ISWANTORO, , Supriyadi, S.H, M.Hum
• Format: Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed
• Published: [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2013
• Subjects: ETD
• Online Access: https://repository.ugm.ac.id/120974/; http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=61012
• Institution: Universitas Gadjah Mada

As a law state, Indonesia has consequences, that all problems should be regulated by the law, both criminal and civil aspects, as well as on dispute issues of industrial Business. Offering of cash payments and custody of money (de aanbod van Gerede betaling gevolgd door CONSIGNATIE) are the final stage of the judicial process that uses industrial Business throughout the civil law since it has been not regulated in Act No. 2 of 2004 on the Settlement of Industrial Business. In this case, the author has completed successfully the research components for the final project in the Advocate office of Arqom, Dony & Co., who lifted the research title: Offering of Cash Payments and Custody of Payment Money for Disputes of Industrial Business. This study was conducted using data from library research, legislation in force relating to the settlement of industrial Business and the practice of fieldwork which is conducted in the Advocate office of Arqom, Dony & Co. During the field work practices, the author helps to do offer cash payment application and custody of money in the Industrial Business Court of Yogyakarta. In such a case occurred due to the plaintiff did not heed the court decision which has a fixed decision (in kracht van gewijsde) to receive a cash payment from the defendant. Offering of cash payment and custody of money from the defendant to carry court decision which has a fixed decision. After the bidding process of cash payments and custody of money are completed then the defendant is free from existing obligation under the cassation decision No. 225K/Pdt.Sus/2011 which is reinforced by the decision of a judicial review No. 23PK/Pdt.Sus/2012.