VALIDASI ETNA (EFFICIENCY TRANSFER FOR NUCLIDE ACTIVITY MEASUREMENTS) UNTUK ANALISIS SAMPEL RADIOAKTIVITAS LINGKUNGAN DENGAN SPEKTROMETRI GAMMA
R esearch s were carried out to ETNA validation for environmental radioactivity sample analysis by means of gamma spectrometry in Low Background Radioactivity Laboratory, PTAPB-BATAN. The main objective of this study was to determine the validity of ETNA in calculate the efficiency of radioactivity...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
| Published: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2013
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://repository.ugm.ac.id/124258/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=64378 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Universitas Gadjah Mada |
| Summary: | R esearch
s were carried out to ETNA validation for environmental
radioactivity sample analysis by means of gamma spectrometry in Low
Background Radioactivity Laboratory, PTAPB-BATAN. The main objective of
this study was to determine the validity of ETNA in calculate the efficiency of
radioactivity measurements of a number of samples which have geometry that is
different to the calibration geometry, and also to find the optimal geometry for
measuring and calibrating processes.
counting The study was conducted by
152
Eu and
241
Am standard point
source with source-to-detector distance variations of 5 cm, 10 cm, 15 cm, 20 cm,
25 cm, and 30 cm, and the IAEA 373 and IAEA 375 cylindrical standard with
source-to-detector distance variations of 0 cm, 5 cm, and 10 cm. The efficiency of
each energy and distance measurements was calculated and then compared with
the results of ETNA calculation to know the difference.
Point source measurement produced difference of above 10% for a distance
of 5 cm and above 5% for a distance of 10 cm. The smallest difference, which
were in range 0.03% - 4.6%, were obtained by using 25 cm source-to-detector
distance as geometry calibration, with measurements geometry of above 15 cm. In
the measurement of the cylindrical source, the smallest differences of 9.34%,
2.70%, and 2.80% were obtained for IAEA 373 standard, and 3.50%, 0.012%, and
1.17% for the IAEA 375 standard in the distance of, respectively 0 cm, 5 cm, and
10 cm, by using calibration geometry of point source within 5 cm of source-todetector
distance. |
|---|