IMPLEMENTASI METODE SAW PADA SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN UNTUK MEMILIH ANGGOTA UKM CATUR UGM UNTUK DIKIRIM KE AJANG PERTANDINGAN
Gadjah Mada University is one university that has a Student Activity Unit the largest in Indonesia. One active sport unit is chess unit, where one of the main agenda is to follow chess championships in university, regional, or national level. Because the funds is not possible to finance all members...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
Published: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://repository.ugm.ac.id/125108/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=65273 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universitas Gadjah Mada |
Summary: | Gadjah Mada University is one university that has a Student Activity Unit
the largest in Indonesia. One active sport unit is chess unit, where one of the main
agenda is to follow chess championships in university, regional, or national level.
Because the funds is not possible to finance all members to participate in the
championship, so should held the selections to get the right and deserve player to
sent in the championship. The selection only with the home tournament is less
effective because it still has some flaw, it so can made some problems.
Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making (FMADM) is one method of
decision support system for selecting the best alternative from a number of
alternatives based on criteria. One method in FMADM is Simple Additive
Weighting (SAW). SAW method is based on the concept of ranking with the pair
comparison between alternatives on criteria. The purpose of this research is to
apply the SAW method in the decision making in chess player selection.
The results showed that the selection process is influenced by the criteria
and an alternative interest rate comparisons among criteria. The criteria used are
the result of selection, discipline, performance of the last 3 months, 1 year recent
achievements, and titles. The results of this research is the system can provide a
list rangking of alternative based on value preferences. Greatest preference value
indicates the feasible and reasonable alternatives to be sent to the tournamnent. |
---|