PERBEDAAN KEBOCORAN TEPI RESIN KOMPOSIT SILORANE DAN RESIN KOMPOSIT METAKRILAT PADA RESTORASI KAVITAS KELAS I
The drawback of methacrylate composite resin is polymerization shrinkage result in a gap development that might cause bacterial or liquid infiltration to dentinal tubules, namely microleakage. Recently, the composite resin development has been focusing on shrink-free composite resin. The latest inve...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
Published: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://repository.ugm.ac.id/125308/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=65475 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universitas Gadjah Mada |
id |
id-ugm-repo.125308 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
id-ugm-repo.1253082016-03-04T08:21:39Z https://repository.ugm.ac.id/125308/ PERBEDAAN KEBOCORAN TEPI RESIN KOMPOSIT SILORANE DAN RESIN KOMPOSIT METAKRILAT PADA RESTORASI KAVITAS KELAS I , AINU ZUHAD SUKATON , drg. Diatri Nari Ratih, M.S., Sp.KG. PhD. ETD The drawback of methacrylate composite resin is polymerization shrinkage result in a gap development that might cause bacterial or liquid infiltration to dentinal tubules, namely microleakage. Recently, the composite resin development has been focusing on shrink-free composite resin. The latest invention issilorane composite resin that has lower shrinkage and good biocompatibility as well as high strength when compared to that methacrylate composite resin. The purpose of this study was to investigate the microleakage difference between silorane composite resin and methacylate composite resin in class I cavity restoration. Subjects were divided randomly into two groups of 10 each. Class 1 cavity preparation was made in each subject. Group 1, was restored usingsilorane composite resin and group 2, was restored using methacrylate composite resin. Thermocycling using a waterbath with 40C and 600C temperature was carried out on both groups, followed by centrifuging in methylen blue solution with 3000 rpm rotation. Subjects were immersed in artificial saliva for 24 hours, then subjects werecut into two in mesial-distal direction with separating disc and calculated using scoring under stereo microscope with 25 magnification. The results showed that the mean rank in both groups were 6,85 and 14,15 respectively. Analysis using U Mann-Whitney test demonstrated that a significant different in microleakage occurred between group 1 and 2 (p<0,05). It can be concluded that the differences in microleakage occurred between class 1 cavity restoration using silorane and methacrylate composite resins. Silorane composite resin had a lower microleakage than methacrylate composite resin. [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2013 Thesis NonPeerReviewed , AINU ZUHAD SUKATON and , drg. Diatri Nari Ratih, M.S., Sp.KG. PhD. (2013) PERBEDAAN KEBOCORAN TEPI RESIN KOMPOSIT SILORANE DAN RESIN KOMPOSIT METAKRILAT PADA RESTORASI KAVITAS KELAS I. UNSPECIFIED thesis, UNSPECIFIED. http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=65475 |
institution |
Universitas Gadjah Mada |
building |
UGM Library |
country |
Indonesia |
collection |
Repository Civitas UGM |
topic |
ETD |
spellingShingle |
ETD , AINU ZUHAD SUKATON , drg. Diatri Nari Ratih, M.S., Sp.KG. PhD. PERBEDAAN KEBOCORAN TEPI RESIN KOMPOSIT SILORANE DAN RESIN KOMPOSIT METAKRILAT PADA RESTORASI KAVITAS KELAS I |
description |
The drawback of methacrylate composite resin is polymerization
shrinkage result in a gap development that might cause bacterial or liquid
infiltration to dentinal tubules, namely microleakage. Recently, the composite
resin development has been focusing on shrink-free composite resin. The latest
invention issilorane composite resin that has lower shrinkage and good
biocompatibility as well as high strength when compared to that methacrylate
composite resin. The purpose of this study was to investigate the microleakage
difference between silorane composite resin and methacylate composite resin in
class I cavity restoration.
Subjects were divided randomly into two groups of 10 each. Class 1 cavity
preparation was made in each subject. Group 1, was restored usingsilorane
composite resin and group 2, was restored using methacrylate composite resin.
Thermocycling using a waterbath with 40C and 600C temperature was carried out
on both groups, followed by centrifuging in methylen blue solution with 3000 rpm
rotation. Subjects were immersed in artificial saliva for 24 hours, then subjects
werecut into two in mesial-distal direction with separating disc and calculated
using scoring under stereo microscope with 25 magnification.
The results showed that the mean rank in both groups were 6,85 and 14,15
respectively. Analysis using U Mann-Whitney test demonstrated that a significant
different in microleakage occurred between group 1 and 2 (p<0,05). It can be
concluded that the differences in microleakage occurred between class 1 cavity
restoration using silorane and methacrylate composite resins. Silorane composite
resin had a lower microleakage than methacrylate composite resin. |
format |
Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
author |
, AINU ZUHAD SUKATON , drg. Diatri Nari Ratih, M.S., Sp.KG. PhD. |
author_facet |
, AINU ZUHAD SUKATON , drg. Diatri Nari Ratih, M.S., Sp.KG. PhD. |
author_sort |
, AINU ZUHAD SUKATON |
title |
PERBEDAAN KEBOCORAN TEPI RESIN KOMPOSIT SILORANE DAN
RESIN KOMPOSIT METAKRILAT PADA RESTORASI KAVITAS
KELAS I |
title_short |
PERBEDAAN KEBOCORAN TEPI RESIN KOMPOSIT SILORANE DAN
RESIN KOMPOSIT METAKRILAT PADA RESTORASI KAVITAS
KELAS I |
title_full |
PERBEDAAN KEBOCORAN TEPI RESIN KOMPOSIT SILORANE DAN
RESIN KOMPOSIT METAKRILAT PADA RESTORASI KAVITAS
KELAS I |
title_fullStr |
PERBEDAAN KEBOCORAN TEPI RESIN KOMPOSIT SILORANE DAN
RESIN KOMPOSIT METAKRILAT PADA RESTORASI KAVITAS
KELAS I |
title_full_unstemmed |
PERBEDAAN KEBOCORAN TEPI RESIN KOMPOSIT SILORANE DAN
RESIN KOMPOSIT METAKRILAT PADA RESTORASI KAVITAS
KELAS I |
title_sort |
perbedaan kebocoran tepi resin komposit silorane dan
resin komposit metakrilat pada restorasi kavitas
kelas i |
publisher |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada |
publishDate |
2013 |
url |
https://repository.ugm.ac.id/125308/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=65475 |
_version_ |
1681232238013841408 |