PERBEDAAN KEBOCORAN TEPI RESIN KOMPOSIT SILORANE DAN RESIN KOMPOSIT METAKRILAT PADA RESTORASI KAVITAS KELAS I

The drawback of methacrylate composite resin is polymerization shrinkage result in a gap development that might cause bacterial or liquid infiltration to dentinal tubules, namely microleakage. Recently, the composite resin development has been focusing on shrink-free composite resin. The latest inve...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: , AINU ZUHAD SUKATON, , drg. Diatri Nari Ratih, M.S., Sp.KG. PhD.
Format: Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed
Published: [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2013
Subjects:
ETD
Online Access:https://repository.ugm.ac.id/125308/
http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=65475
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universitas Gadjah Mada
id id-ugm-repo.125308
record_format dspace
spelling id-ugm-repo.1253082016-03-04T08:21:39Z https://repository.ugm.ac.id/125308/ PERBEDAAN KEBOCORAN TEPI RESIN KOMPOSIT SILORANE DAN RESIN KOMPOSIT METAKRILAT PADA RESTORASI KAVITAS KELAS I , AINU ZUHAD SUKATON , drg. Diatri Nari Ratih, M.S., Sp.KG. PhD. ETD The drawback of methacrylate composite resin is polymerization shrinkage result in a gap development that might cause bacterial or liquid infiltration to dentinal tubules, namely microleakage. Recently, the composite resin development has been focusing on shrink-free composite resin. The latest invention issilorane composite resin that has lower shrinkage and good biocompatibility as well as high strength when compared to that methacrylate composite resin. The purpose of this study was to investigate the microleakage difference between silorane composite resin and methacylate composite resin in class I cavity restoration. Subjects were divided randomly into two groups of 10 each. Class 1 cavity preparation was made in each subject. Group 1, was restored usingsilorane composite resin and group 2, was restored using methacrylate composite resin. Thermocycling using a waterbath with 40C and 600C temperature was carried out on both groups, followed by centrifuging in methylen blue solution with 3000 rpm rotation. Subjects were immersed in artificial saliva for 24 hours, then subjects werecut into two in mesial-distal direction with separating disc and calculated using scoring under stereo microscope with 25 magnification. The results showed that the mean rank in both groups were 6,85 and 14,15 respectively. Analysis using U Mann-Whitney test demonstrated that a significant different in microleakage occurred between group 1 and 2 (p<0,05). It can be concluded that the differences in microleakage occurred between class 1 cavity restoration using silorane and methacrylate composite resins. Silorane composite resin had a lower microleakage than methacrylate composite resin. [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2013 Thesis NonPeerReviewed , AINU ZUHAD SUKATON and , drg. Diatri Nari Ratih, M.S., Sp.KG. PhD. (2013) PERBEDAAN KEBOCORAN TEPI RESIN KOMPOSIT SILORANE DAN RESIN KOMPOSIT METAKRILAT PADA RESTORASI KAVITAS KELAS I. UNSPECIFIED thesis, UNSPECIFIED. http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=65475
institution Universitas Gadjah Mada
building UGM Library
country Indonesia
collection Repository Civitas UGM
topic ETD
spellingShingle ETD
, AINU ZUHAD SUKATON
, drg. Diatri Nari Ratih, M.S., Sp.KG. PhD.
PERBEDAAN KEBOCORAN TEPI RESIN KOMPOSIT SILORANE DAN RESIN KOMPOSIT METAKRILAT PADA RESTORASI KAVITAS KELAS I
description The drawback of methacrylate composite resin is polymerization shrinkage result in a gap development that might cause bacterial or liquid infiltration to dentinal tubules, namely microleakage. Recently, the composite resin development has been focusing on shrink-free composite resin. The latest invention issilorane composite resin that has lower shrinkage and good biocompatibility as well as high strength when compared to that methacrylate composite resin. The purpose of this study was to investigate the microleakage difference between silorane composite resin and methacylate composite resin in class I cavity restoration. Subjects were divided randomly into two groups of 10 each. Class 1 cavity preparation was made in each subject. Group 1, was restored usingsilorane composite resin and group 2, was restored using methacrylate composite resin. Thermocycling using a waterbath with 40C and 600C temperature was carried out on both groups, followed by centrifuging in methylen blue solution with 3000 rpm rotation. Subjects were immersed in artificial saliva for 24 hours, then subjects werecut into two in mesial-distal direction with separating disc and calculated using scoring under stereo microscope with 25 magnification. The results showed that the mean rank in both groups were 6,85 and 14,15 respectively. Analysis using U Mann-Whitney test demonstrated that a significant different in microleakage occurred between group 1 and 2 (p<0,05). It can be concluded that the differences in microleakage occurred between class 1 cavity restoration using silorane and methacrylate composite resins. Silorane composite resin had a lower microleakage than methacrylate composite resin.
format Theses and Dissertations
NonPeerReviewed
author , AINU ZUHAD SUKATON
, drg. Diatri Nari Ratih, M.S., Sp.KG. PhD.
author_facet , AINU ZUHAD SUKATON
, drg. Diatri Nari Ratih, M.S., Sp.KG. PhD.
author_sort , AINU ZUHAD SUKATON
title PERBEDAAN KEBOCORAN TEPI RESIN KOMPOSIT SILORANE DAN RESIN KOMPOSIT METAKRILAT PADA RESTORASI KAVITAS KELAS I
title_short PERBEDAAN KEBOCORAN TEPI RESIN KOMPOSIT SILORANE DAN RESIN KOMPOSIT METAKRILAT PADA RESTORASI KAVITAS KELAS I
title_full PERBEDAAN KEBOCORAN TEPI RESIN KOMPOSIT SILORANE DAN RESIN KOMPOSIT METAKRILAT PADA RESTORASI KAVITAS KELAS I
title_fullStr PERBEDAAN KEBOCORAN TEPI RESIN KOMPOSIT SILORANE DAN RESIN KOMPOSIT METAKRILAT PADA RESTORASI KAVITAS KELAS I
title_full_unstemmed PERBEDAAN KEBOCORAN TEPI RESIN KOMPOSIT SILORANE DAN RESIN KOMPOSIT METAKRILAT PADA RESTORASI KAVITAS KELAS I
title_sort perbedaan kebocoran tepi resin komposit silorane dan resin komposit metakrilat pada restorasi kavitas kelas i
publisher [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
publishDate 2013
url https://repository.ugm.ac.id/125308/
http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=65475
_version_ 1681232238013841408