KAJIAN AKURASI INTERPRETASI HIBRIDA MENGGUNAKAN EMPAT INDEKS VEGETASI UNTUK PEMETAAN KERAPATAN KANOPI DI KAWASAN HUTAN KABUPATEN GUNUNGKIDUL
The purposes of this study are: (1) optimize the advantages and minimize the weaknesses in visual and digital interpretation method by hybrid interpretation, (2) examine the correlation between vegetation index transformation with the data density of vegetation canopy to get the best hybrid formula,...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
Published: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://repository.ugm.ac.id/126777/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=67011 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universitas Gadjah Mada |
Summary: | The purposes of this study are: (1) optimize the advantages and minimize
the weaknesses in visual and digital interpretation method by hybrid
interpretation, (2) examine the correlation between vegetation index
transformation with the data density of vegetation canopy to get the best
hybrid formula, and (3) mapping forest canopy density in Gunungkidul. The
method used is the hybrid interpretation. Hybrid interpretation is a
combination of visual interpretation for object delineation and
interpretation of digital imagery to identify vegetation canopy density. The
imagery used is ALOS AVNIR-2 in 2009. Object of study in this research is
partly forest in Gunungkidul.
Hybrid structured key interpretation of the image that has a high
correlation with the value of the vegetation canopy density. While the
highest correlation value is obtained by means of placing every building
blocks in the image of the vegetation canopy vegetation index
transformation (RVI, TVI, NDVI, MSAVI). The results of the correlation
analysis indicates that NDVI has the highest coefficient correlation when
compared with other vegetation index, which is equal to 0.78. Formula of
hybrid interpretation which consists of five classes, among others, very
dense forest NDVI �0,276, rather dense/heavy, NDVI�0,116 AND
NDVI�0,275, open forest NDVI�(-0,004) AND NDVI�0,115, rarely forest
NDVI�(-0,038) AND NDVI�(-0,004), and little/no trees NDVI�(-0,037).
Vegetation canopy density interpretation results shows that the study area is
dominated by density class rather dense /heavy with the area of 2541 ha or
43.17% of the total area. While the level of mapping overall accuracy (the
accuracy of interpretation hybrid) resulting is equal to 93.02%. |
---|