PERBANDINGAN KUALITAS CITRA HARD COPY DENGAN HASIL DIGITIZER DAN KAMERA SAKU PADA FOTO POLOS FRAKTUR TULANG EKSTREMITAS ATAS DI BAGIAN RADIOLOGI RSUP DR. SARDJITO
Background : Fracture of upper extremity is an emergency situation which need a quick treatment. The diagnose could be done by running a supporting examination, which is radiology. Indonesia only have for about 700 radiologist which distributed unevenly, therefore teleradiology is needed. Teleradiol...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
Published: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://repository.ugm.ac.id/127859/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=68165 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universitas Gadjah Mada |
Summary: | Background : Fracture of upper extremity is an emergency
situation which need a quick treatment. The diagnose
could be done by running a supporting examination, which
is radiology. Indonesia only have for about 700
radiologist which distributed unevenly, therefore
teleradiology is needed. Teleradiology needs an imaging
device which could produce a good quality image, so there
will be no misinterpretation on the reading process.
Objective : Understanding the quality differences and
diagnose of hard copy film and soft copy file of
digitizer and pocket camera of plain upper extremity
fracture x-ray.
Method and Material : This is an observational research,
using 34 samples of plain upper extremity fracture x-ray.
The digital data from work station is being printed using
a laser printer into hard copy form, then the hard copy
film is being digitalized using digitizer and pocket
camera. The image quality of soft copy files of digitizer
and pocket camera are being compared with the hard copy.
Result : There were no significant differences of image
quality among hard copy film and soft copy file of
digitizer (p=1.000), buat there were significant
differences among hard copy film and soft copy file of
pocket camera (p=0.000). There were no significant
differences of diagnose among hard copy film and soft
copy file of digitizer and pocket camera (p=1.000).
Conclusion : Image quality of soft copy file of digitizer
is equal with hard copy film quality, and hard copy film
image quality is better than soft copy file of pocket
camera. The diagnose of the three sample groups have
uniformity. |
---|