EVALUASI PELAKSANAAN KEGIATAN KULIAH KERJA KESEHATAN MASYARAKAT (K3M) DI KECAMATAN KOKAP, KABUPATEN KULON PROGO

• Main Authors: , DINAR CHIEKO TRIESAYUNINGTYAS, , dr. Rustamadji, M.Kes
• Format: Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed
• Published: [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2014
• Subjects: ETD
• Online Access: https://repository.ugm.ac.id/128197/; http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=68532
• Institution: Universitas Gadjah Mada

Background: K3M or Kuliah Kerja Kesehatan Masyarakat was a program held by Faculty of Medicine Gadjah Mada University. This program was the equivalent of Kuliah Kerja Nyata Program Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (KKN PPM) which is held by Gadjah Mada University. The evaluation of K3M activity is important so that we could find out the effectiveness of the program or what were the positive and negative impact of the activity on the students who carried out the activity and the community where the activity was held. The results of this evaluation could be used for an instrument by the Faculty of Medicine GMU to consider whether we should continue or recreate this program in the future. Objective: This research was done in order to evaluate the Kuliah Kerja Kesehatan Masyarakat (K3M) program in Kecamatan Kokap, Kabupaten Kulon Progo. Method: This research used qualitative method with the output being descriptive explanation. The datas were obtained from the community health problem solving report of K3M program in Kecamatan Kokap, Kabupaten Kulon Progo. Result: Three out of nine reports were missing some of the content on the report. The problem solving activity which were reported on five out of nine reports observed were not done according to the results of risk factor identification. After observing all of the reports, it was not impossible if there were any violation of the research report ethics by looking at some questionable datas on the reports. This could be caused by the flawed reporting system or flawed grading system. The students' role as a doctor were also less noticeable by observing the reports. In addition, suggestion or recommendation on the report were less appropriate because they were aimed at the people where the student wouldn't be able to follow up if there were/were no changes in the community. Conclusion: Recommendation for Faculty of Medicine GMU as the organizer of the K3M program is needed so that they support and facilitate the implementation of the problem solving program with the intention to improve the effectiveness. On the other hand, the reporting system needs to be reconsidered because it didn't reflect the role of the students as a primary health care doctor.