Koeksistensi Antara Tradisionalitas dan Modernitas Perihal Ekonomi dan Budaya di Kota Surakarta
Traditional institutions in Indonesia never get a clear status in the government. Although previously traditional institutions is an important part in the formation of the Indonesian nation, but many traditional institutions was abandoned nowadays. Indonesia prefers the modern institutions to handle...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
Published: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://repository.ugm.ac.id/129769/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=70166 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universitas Gadjah Mada |
Summary: | Traditional institutions in Indonesia never get a clear status in the government.
Although previously traditional institutions is an important part in the formation
of the Indonesian nation, but many traditional institutions was abandoned
nowadays. Indonesia prefers the modern institutions to handle the formal
government to execute the government. But in the last decades the traditional
institutions began to strengthen. Finally the strengthenin traditional institutions
must be joggle with modern institution that holds the formal institution in several
regions in Indonesia. The goal of this research to explain the pattern of relations
between the traditional institutions with modern institutions in Surakarta in the
economic and cultural affairs during the Mayor Joko Widodo. This research uses
the concept of a case study with qualitative research. Amid the many studies that
discuss the strengthening of traditional institutions, this research into a new
outlook in view of the traditional institutions amid the dominance of modern
institutions in Indonesia.
Surakarta Kingdom and Surakarta government are coexistence. But their
relationship is joggle in the economic affair during Mayor Joko Widodo. The
relationship in the economic affair is competition, as occurs in the labeling objects
of cultural heritage Surakarta Kingdom�s property. The relationship in the cultural
affair is competition and complementary. Competition occurs in the struggle for
cultural authority, and complementary in terms of culture functions as a tourism
asset.
connecting these two institutions is important nowadays, because until now the
relationship between traditional institutions and modern institutions are still a lot
of type of competition. Even if there were patterned complementary relationship,
it�s because the modern institutions and traditional institutions still need to
increase financial cooperation. If both of these institutions in a unified logic, the
synergies between the two institutions are becoming increasingly powerful and
traditional institutions get clarity on the status of the modern times. |
---|