PERBANDINGAN VERIFIKASI TANDA TANGAN DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN JARINGAN SARAF TIRUAN BACKPROPAGATION DAN SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE
Signature represents biometric feature useful to verify individual�s identity. The study presents the implementation of the signature identification with Support Vector Machine and compared with neural network backpropagation of 100 signature samples. Feature extraction using vertical splitting an...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
Published: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://repository.ugm.ac.id/130236/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=70651 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universitas Gadjah Mada |
id |
id-ugm-repo.130236 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
id-ugm-repo.1302362016-03-04T07:53:26Z https://repository.ugm.ac.id/130236/ PERBANDINGAN VERIFIKASI TANDA TANGAN DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN JARINGAN SARAF TIRUAN BACKPROPAGATION DAN SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE , Barry Caesar Oktariyadi , Drs. Agus Harjoko, M.Sc., Ph.D ETD Signature represents biometric feature useful to verify individual�s identity. The study presents the implementation of the signature identification with Support Vector Machine and compared with neural network backpropagation of 100 signature samples. Feature extraction using vertical splitting and horizontal splitting to get the value of the angle and distance as the characteristic value of the signature which would then be in the process. Artificial neural network classification methods Backpropagation earning Neural Network (ANN-BP) and support vector machine (SVM). The Artificial Neural Network with Backpropagation learning method consists of 100 input nodes, 3 hidden layer and 2 output nodes, while its learning function uses resilient backpropagation. Support Vector Machine (SVM) is implemented using one-againt-one method. ANN-BP has an accuracy in the verification of 98.5%, while SVM 94.5% for Traced signatures, ANN with back propagation method is able to verify with the accuracy of 82%, while for the new SVM signatures could not be verified with an accuracy of 43%. The JST with the backpropagation method is faster for the learning process than the SVM. [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2014 Thesis NonPeerReviewed , Barry Caesar Oktariyadi and , Drs. Agus Harjoko, M.Sc., Ph.D (2014) PERBANDINGAN VERIFIKASI TANDA TANGAN DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN JARINGAN SARAF TIRUAN BACKPROPAGATION DAN SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE. UNSPECIFIED thesis, UNSPECIFIED. http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=70651 |
institution |
Universitas Gadjah Mada |
building |
UGM Library |
country |
Indonesia |
collection |
Repository Civitas UGM |
topic |
ETD |
spellingShingle |
ETD , Barry Caesar Oktariyadi , Drs. Agus Harjoko, M.Sc., Ph.D PERBANDINGAN VERIFIKASI TANDA TANGAN DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN JARINGAN SARAF TIRUAN BACKPROPAGATION DAN SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE |
description |
Signature represents biometric feature useful to verify individual�s
identity. The study presents the implementation of the signature identification with
Support Vector Machine and compared with neural network backpropagation of
100 signature samples. Feature extraction using vertical splitting and horizontal
splitting to get the value of the angle and distance as the characteristic value of
the signature which would then be in the process. Artificial neural network
classification methods Backpropagation earning Neural Network (ANN-BP) and
support vector machine (SVM). The Artificial Neural Network with
Backpropagation learning method consists of 100 input nodes, 3 hidden layer
and 2 output nodes, while its learning function uses resilient backpropagation.
Support Vector Machine (SVM) is implemented using one-againt-one method.
ANN-BP has an accuracy in the verification of 98.5%, while SVM 94.5% for
Traced signatures, ANN with back propagation method is able to verify with the
accuracy of 82%, while for the new SVM signatures could not be verified with an
accuracy of 43%. The JST with the backpropagation method is faster for the
learning process than the SVM. |
format |
Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
author |
, Barry Caesar Oktariyadi , Drs. Agus Harjoko, M.Sc., Ph.D |
author_facet |
, Barry Caesar Oktariyadi , Drs. Agus Harjoko, M.Sc., Ph.D |
author_sort |
, Barry Caesar Oktariyadi |
title |
PERBANDINGAN VERIFIKASI TANDA TANGAN DENGAN
MENGGUNAKAN JARINGAN SARAF TIRUAN BACKPROPAGATION DAN SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE |
title_short |
PERBANDINGAN VERIFIKASI TANDA TANGAN DENGAN
MENGGUNAKAN JARINGAN SARAF TIRUAN BACKPROPAGATION DAN SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE |
title_full |
PERBANDINGAN VERIFIKASI TANDA TANGAN DENGAN
MENGGUNAKAN JARINGAN SARAF TIRUAN BACKPROPAGATION DAN SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE |
title_fullStr |
PERBANDINGAN VERIFIKASI TANDA TANGAN DENGAN
MENGGUNAKAN JARINGAN SARAF TIRUAN BACKPROPAGATION DAN SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE |
title_full_unstemmed |
PERBANDINGAN VERIFIKASI TANDA TANGAN DENGAN
MENGGUNAKAN JARINGAN SARAF TIRUAN BACKPROPAGATION DAN SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE |
title_sort |
perbandingan verifikasi tanda tangan dengan
menggunakan jaringan saraf tiruan backpropagation dan support vector machine |
publisher |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
https://repository.ugm.ac.id/130236/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=70651 |
_version_ |
1681233114501742592 |