Telaah Penggunaan Sidik Jari Penghadap Yang Dilekatkan Pada Minuta Akta Pasca Revisi Undang-Udang Jabatan Notaris
After the law revision on notarial post, emerges the Article 16 paragraph (1) point C requiring the notaries to attach letters, documents and fingerprints on minutes of deeds. Due to the content of the article, the implementation in each notary is varied. The provisions in this article become the...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
| Published: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://repository.ugm.ac.id/130636/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=71062 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Universitas Gadjah Mada |
| Summary: | After the law revision on notarial post, emerges the Article 16 paragraph (1)
point C requiring the notaries to attach letters, documents and fingerprints on minutes
of deeds. Due to the content of the article, the implementation in each notary is
varied. The provisions in this article become the main topic due to multiple
interpretations of the notaries on the technique in attaching the fingerprints on
minutes of deeds.
This research employed empirical legal research. Empirically or
sociologically, by observing the legal fact in the society. This research was empirical
research because the data in this research were obtained directly from the field.
Based on the research, it can be concluded that the intention of this article is
to protect the notaries from a great number of renunciation of attendance and
appearers� signatures, if a dispute occurs between them in the future. The objective of
the article is embodied in the prudence principle of the notaries in the process of the
draw up of deeds. The implementation in each notary office is varied according to the
interpretation of the notaries. The legal consequence that will later emerge if the
provision is not implemented is that the deeds will lose their authenticity due to the
fingerprints which are not a part of the minutes of deeds. The inhibiting factor, such
as the article�s content that does not mention which fingerprint used is not a problem,
as the intention of the legislature is that legally defective appearers may also give
their fingerprints. Further inhibiting factor is to gather the appearers during the
approval of the deeds because by the provision of the fingerprints, the appearers must
come in person to provide their fingerprints |
|---|