PERBANDINGAN ANTARA SKOR APFEL DAN SKOR KOIVURANTA TERHADAP PREDIKSI TERJADINYA MUAL DAN MUNTAH PASCA OPERASI PADA ANESTESI UMUM
Background. PONV is one of the side effects that often occur after general anesthesia, occurs in the first 24 hours post surgery and occurs in as many as 30 - 70 % of hospitalized patients. PONV greatly avoided by most patients and anesthesiologists. Recent risk score for prediction of PONV has been...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
Published: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://repository.ugm.ac.id/133515/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=74205 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universitas Gadjah Mada |
Summary: | Background. PONV is one of the side effects that often occur after general
anesthesia, occurs in the first 24 hours post surgery and occurs in as many as 30 -
70 % of hospitalized patients. PONV greatly avoided by most patients and
anesthesiologists. Recent risk score for prediction of PONV has been used as a
way to classify patients according to risk prediction and provide prophylaxis in
accordance with this classification. For everyday clinical purposes, a simple risk
score in easy to do and shows the correlation between the predicted incidence of
PONV in patients hospitalized. In the clinical practice known various risk score
for prediction of PONV as Apfel scores, Koivuranta scores, Sinclair scores,
Palazzo scores, Gan scores, and Scholz scores varying accuracy.
Objective. The main purpose of this study is to determine whether the scores
Apfel more accurate than Koivuranta scores in predicting the occurrence of
PONV in patients with general anesthesia.
Methods. The research design was a cohort study with the total of 80 patients
recruited. Data analysis is done by determining sensitivity, spesifisity, positive
predictive value, negative predictive value, and ROC curve.
Results. Apfel scores has sensitivity 78,1%, spesifisity 12,5%, positive predictive
value 78,1% and negative predictive value 12,5%. ROC curve of Apfel scores has
strength values 0,818. Koivuranta scores has sensitivity 91,7%, spesifisity 46,4%,
positive predictive value 42,3% and negative predictive value 92,8%. ROC curve
of Koivuranta scores has strength values 0,848. It means Koivuranta scores more
accurate than Apfel scores with sensitivity ( 91,7% and 78,1% ), spesifisity (
46,4% and 12,5% ), and strength values of ROC curve ( 0,848 dan 0,818 )
Koivuranta scores higher than Apfel scores.
Conclusions. Koivuranta scores are more accurate than the Apfel scores in
predicting the occurrence of PONV in patients with general anesthesia.
Keywords : PONV, PONV predicting score, Apfel score, Koivuranta score,
nausea, vomiting |
---|