INTEGRASI PELAYANAN METROMINI DALAM PENGEMBANGAN SISTEM TRANSPORTASI MASSAL TRANSJAKARTA (Studi Kasus Metromini 47 Jurusan Pondok Kopi � Pasar Senen)
Choosing a mode of transportation for the trip origin-destination can not be separated from the aspects (criteria) to be considered for smooth traveling. Among the aspects (criteria) to be considered as service chooses a mode (involving fare, waiting time, reliability, safety, comfort, safety), up-d...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
| Published: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://repository.ugm.ac.id/133718/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=74506 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Universitas Gadjah Mada |
| Summary: | Choosing a mode of transportation for the trip origin-destination can not be separated from the aspects (criteria) to be considered for smooth traveling. Among the aspects (criteria) to be considered as service chooses a mode (involving fare, waiting time, reliability, safety, comfort, safety), up-down passenger zone (involving bus stops, intersections, place of activities and anywhere), and transport modes (involving capacity, travel time, waiting time, fare, and frequency of transport). Integration of transport modes will be easier for users to perform origin-destination trip. The concept of proper integration will be able to encourage people to use public transport, so that the selection mode will only consider aspects of the destination.
This study was conducted to analyze aspects (criteria) were dominant in the modal choice for users of Metromini with AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process). Then these criteria will be the basis of improved mass transportation modes that already exist, in this case Transjakarta which will then become the parent mass transportation highway.
From the analysis of modal choice then compiled integration scenario combined with the responses of the respondents concerning the attitude towards the fore of Metromini with the top two options are selected, namely the concept of the existence of substitute modes Metromini integrated with Transjakarta with 80% of respondents agreed. Then the concept of change Metromini into the feeder, on routes that non-busway with 70% of respondents agreed. On the basis of modal choice and response aspects of these respondents were then compiled Metromini integration scenario (in this study Metromini 47) into the Transjakarta as a mass transportation system improvement efforts forward. |
|---|