Implementasi rencana umum tata ruang kota :: Kasus Kecamatan Serpong Kabupaten Dati II Tangerang

• Main Author: FITRI, Kurnia
• Format: Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed
• Published: Universitas Gadjah Mada 1998
• Subjects: Environment Policy; Public Administration
• Online Access: https://repository.ugm.ac.id/171843/; http://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=124
• Institution: Universitas Gadjah Mada

T he development implemented i n K ecamatan Serpong (Serpong Subdistrict) was according t o P eraturan daerah No.4 t ahun 1989 (1989 Regional Regulation Number 4 ) . U rban development policy was accurately carried out by involving a s B adan Pembangunan Daerah several executives,such (Regional Development Planning Authority), Dinas T a t a Rota ( Urban Hanagement Office), Dines P ekerjaan Umum (Public W ork Office), Camat ( Subdistrict Head), Lurah ( Village Chief). Analysis on the urban development policy o f S erpong subdistrict was based on the city functions comprised residential, trading and service functions, and city functions served as scientific, cultural, recreational centers. Based on the results of the study, it was c oncluded that the urban development policy had n o t b een optimally implemented yet, as outlined in Rencana Umum T a t a R uang Kota (Urban Layout General Plan) concept. The influencing factors on optimal urban development policy implementation were territorial supporting potential and life quality variables. The territorial supporting potential of Serpong subdistrict was able t o be viewed f rom i ts population; the increasing population influenced on t he allocated layout. The density of the population was uneven; people preferred domains with the available infrastructures of r oad, bridge, and other facilities favorable f or t heir life activities. The layout concept,therefore, arranged-.did not optimally function. On the residential function, it was s een that i t a ctually served as just a place of settlement, and there was no industrial development available. Since residents occupied the domains facilitated with available roads and bridges, however, the domains with no infrastructures became desolate. Therefore, the urban development intervention was essential t o be substantially manifested in each stages of development, s o it reduced the tendency of population concentration on urban center, while other domain tended to have slow development. This condition would had influences o n t he territorial supporting potential. The life quality variable indicated that there was s patial influences o f s ociety in performing activities o n t he life quality. This can be viewed from the notably health ikdicators on dominant epidemics within community such as diarrhea and lungs tuberculosis. Implemented spatial condition caused the reduction o f e nvironmental quality and the epidemics; this reflected that there was spatial influences on the life quality.