Systemic risk and the financial network system: an experimental investigation

This paper investigates the economic agent behavior when managing a bank in order to avoid a failure when exposed with the financial systemic risk using a lab experiment. We use Chen et al.’s (Oper Res 64:1089–1108, 2016) model to construct the decision problem in the experiment. The model assumes t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Permana, Yudistira, Akbar, Saiqa, Nurpita, Anisa
Format: Article PeerReviewed
Language:English
Published: Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.ugm.ac.id/282839/1/s40822-022-00207-7.pdf
https://repository.ugm.ac.id/282839/
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40822-022-00207-7
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universitas Gadjah Mada
Language: English
id id-ugm-repo.282839
record_format dspace
spelling id-ugm-repo.2828392023-11-17T03:14:10Z https://repository.ugm.ac.id/282839/ Systemic risk and the financial network system: an experimental investigation Permana, Yudistira Akbar, Saiqa Nurpita, Anisa Finance This paper investigates the economic agent behavior when managing a bank in order to avoid a failure when exposed with the financial systemic risk using a lab experiment. We use Chen et al.’s (Oper Res 64:1089–1108, 2016) model to construct the decision problem in the experiment. The model assumes that the systemic risk occurs through two channels: the liquidity channel and the network channel. The former occurs from the external investment shock which is endogenous in the balance sheet. The latter is a function of other banks’ clearing repayment; which is also caused by the external investment shock. Given these, there are two intuitive optimal strategies in order to avoid a failure: imposing a higher external investment interest than that of its risk and avoiding the financial interactions with the high-risky banks. We use students and bankers as our subjects to check the validity of Chen et al.’s optimal strategy given their respective background. Our results show that both students and bankers partially follow Chen et al.’s intuitive optimal strategy: the first strategy. Only the student group is found to follow the second optimal intuitive strategy of Chen et al. In addition, both subject groups have a different behavior in order to avoid the failure. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH 2022 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en https://repository.ugm.ac.id/282839/1/s40822-022-00207-7.pdf Permana, Yudistira and Akbar, Saiqa and Nurpita, Anisa (2022) Systemic risk and the financial network system: an experimental investigation. Eurasian Economic Review, 12 (4). 631 – 651. ISSN 1309422X https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40822-022-00207-7
institution Universitas Gadjah Mada
building UGM Library
continent Asia
country Indonesia
Indonesia
content_provider UGM Library
collection Repository Civitas UGM
language English
topic Finance
spellingShingle Finance
Permana, Yudistira
Akbar, Saiqa
Nurpita, Anisa
Systemic risk and the financial network system: an experimental investigation
description This paper investigates the economic agent behavior when managing a bank in order to avoid a failure when exposed with the financial systemic risk using a lab experiment. We use Chen et al.’s (Oper Res 64:1089–1108, 2016) model to construct the decision problem in the experiment. The model assumes that the systemic risk occurs through two channels: the liquidity channel and the network channel. The former occurs from the external investment shock which is endogenous in the balance sheet. The latter is a function of other banks’ clearing repayment; which is also caused by the external investment shock. Given these, there are two intuitive optimal strategies in order to avoid a failure: imposing a higher external investment interest than that of its risk and avoiding the financial interactions with the high-risky banks. We use students and bankers as our subjects to check the validity of Chen et al.’s optimal strategy given their respective background. Our results show that both students and bankers partially follow Chen et al.’s intuitive optimal strategy: the first strategy. Only the student group is found to follow the second optimal intuitive strategy of Chen et al. In addition, both subject groups have a different behavior in order to avoid the failure.
format Article
PeerReviewed
author Permana, Yudistira
Akbar, Saiqa
Nurpita, Anisa
author_facet Permana, Yudistira
Akbar, Saiqa
Nurpita, Anisa
author_sort Permana, Yudistira
title Systemic risk and the financial network system: an experimental investigation
title_short Systemic risk and the financial network system: an experimental investigation
title_full Systemic risk and the financial network system: an experimental investigation
title_fullStr Systemic risk and the financial network system: an experimental investigation
title_full_unstemmed Systemic risk and the financial network system: an experimental investigation
title_sort systemic risk and the financial network system: an experimental investigation
publisher Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
publishDate 2022
url https://repository.ugm.ac.id/282839/1/s40822-022-00207-7.pdf
https://repository.ugm.ac.id/282839/
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40822-022-00207-7
_version_ 1783956346583908352