KEADILAN BAGI YANG BERBEDA PAHAM: REKONSILIASI DAN KEADILAN BAGI KORBAN TRAGEDI 1965
Human rights enforcement is one improperly- accomplished agenda in this post-1998 democratisation. Severe human rights violations such as 1965 Tragedy remain obscure, nonlitigation resolution (e.g. recognition and compensation) is considered the best solution. Recognition also is a form of respect t...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article NonPeerReviewed |
| Published: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2010
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://repository.ugm.ac.id/28315/ http://i-lib.ugm.ac.id/jurnal/download.php?dataId=11378 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Universitas Gadjah Mada |
| Summary: | Human rights enforcement is one improperly-
accomplished agenda in this post-1998 democratisation. Severe human rights violations such as 1965 Tragedy remain obscure, nonlitigation resolution (e.g. recognition and compensation) is considered the best solution. Recognition also is a form of respect to human rights and a stepping stone to resolve other tragedies.
Penegakan HAM merupakan salah satu agenda demokratisasi yang belum sepenuhnya tercapai. Pelanggaran-pelanggaran HAM berat seperti Tragedi 1965 masih belum jelas sehingga penyelesaian nonlitigasi (pengakuan dan kompensasi), dianggap sebagai solusi yang terbaik. Pengakuan tersebut merupakan bentuk tanggungjawab untuk menghormati HAM dan menjadi batu loncatan untuk mengungkap tragedi HAM lainnya. |
|---|