Who should care? Exploring the views and experiences of individuals in negotiating solutions for health security

Purpose: The Indonesian healthcare system has been reformed in tune with economic and political changes. The reform was pursued by encouraging growing reliance on individual contributions. Consolidating citizens' support has become increasingly important for the long-term sustainability of the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Yuda, Tauchid Komara
Format: Article PeerReviewed
Language:English
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.ugm.ac.id/284506/1/10-1108_IJSSP-09-2021-0246.pdf
https://repository.ugm.ac.id/284506/
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85121324744&doi=10.1108%2fIJSSP-09-2021-0246&partnerID=40&md5=ce51c59ce71ccf83fa6f934b1c8f1e0b
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universitas Gadjah Mada
Language: English
id id-ugm-repo.284506
record_format dspace
spelling id-ugm-repo.2845062023-12-29T02:40:20Z https://repository.ugm.ac.id/284506/ Who should care? Exploring the views and experiences of individuals in negotiating solutions for health security Yuda, Tauchid Komara Sociology Purpose: The Indonesian healthcare system has been reformed in tune with economic and political changes. The reform was pursued by encouraging growing reliance on individual contributions. Consolidating citizens' support has become increasingly important for the long-term sustainability of the programme. This study explores individual views and experiences in negotiating solutions for health security under the situation where pre-industrial modes of informal network remain intact, while private healthcare continues to be in demand by population segments targeted by the system. Design/methodology/approach: Individual attitudes toward the current healthcare system were explored using online interviews (N = 75) in the cities of Jakarta and Yogyakarta, Indonesia. The qualitative exploratory approach resorted to personal views on the importance of the state, family and market in health risk management. Perceptions on who should be responsible for healthcare, and the political legitimacy of the welfare-state approach to healthcare were also observed. A thematic coding strategy was used for the data analysis. Findings: Those interviewed value and support the formal system (either state and market), yet place reliance on informal support (family and relatives). Intertwining views of religious teaching, filial piety, moral obligation were the most common reasons for individuals to support such dual welfare systems. The findings reflect the common attitudes toward welfare in the context of changing realities of individualised society at the early stage. Originality/value: This article represents a valuable contribution at the empirical level because it provides an assessment of individuals' attitudes toward Indonesia's recent health arrangements. Such individuals are those belonging to the targeted population of the contributory system. This study also offers an alternative framework for understanding the nature of the healthcare regime generated from the perspectives of individuals. © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited. 2022 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en https://repository.ugm.ac.id/284506/1/10-1108_IJSSP-09-2021-0246.pdf Yuda, Tauchid Komara (2022) Who should care? Exploring the views and experiences of individuals in negotiating solutions for health security. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 42 (11-12). 1109 – 1128. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85121324744&doi=10.1108%2fIJSSP-09-2021-0246&partnerID=40&md5=ce51c59ce71ccf83fa6f934b1c8f1e0b
institution Universitas Gadjah Mada
building UGM Library
continent Asia
country Indonesia
Indonesia
content_provider UGM Library
collection Repository Civitas UGM
language English
topic Sociology
spellingShingle Sociology
Yuda, Tauchid Komara
Who should care? Exploring the views and experiences of individuals in negotiating solutions for health security
description Purpose: The Indonesian healthcare system has been reformed in tune with economic and political changes. The reform was pursued by encouraging growing reliance on individual contributions. Consolidating citizens' support has become increasingly important for the long-term sustainability of the programme. This study explores individual views and experiences in negotiating solutions for health security under the situation where pre-industrial modes of informal network remain intact, while private healthcare continues to be in demand by population segments targeted by the system. Design/methodology/approach: Individual attitudes toward the current healthcare system were explored using online interviews (N = 75) in the cities of Jakarta and Yogyakarta, Indonesia. The qualitative exploratory approach resorted to personal views on the importance of the state, family and market in health risk management. Perceptions on who should be responsible for healthcare, and the political legitimacy of the welfare-state approach to healthcare were also observed. A thematic coding strategy was used for the data analysis. Findings: Those interviewed value and support the formal system (either state and market), yet place reliance on informal support (family and relatives). Intertwining views of religious teaching, filial piety, moral obligation were the most common reasons for individuals to support such dual welfare systems. The findings reflect the common attitudes toward welfare in the context of changing realities of individualised society at the early stage. Originality/value: This article represents a valuable contribution at the empirical level because it provides an assessment of individuals' attitudes toward Indonesia's recent health arrangements. Such individuals are those belonging to the targeted population of the contributory system. This study also offers an alternative framework for understanding the nature of the healthcare regime generated from the perspectives of individuals. © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited.
format Article
PeerReviewed
author Yuda, Tauchid Komara
author_facet Yuda, Tauchid Komara
author_sort Yuda, Tauchid Komara
title Who should care? Exploring the views and experiences of individuals in negotiating solutions for health security
title_short Who should care? Exploring the views and experiences of individuals in negotiating solutions for health security
title_full Who should care? Exploring the views and experiences of individuals in negotiating solutions for health security
title_fullStr Who should care? Exploring the views and experiences of individuals in negotiating solutions for health security
title_full_unstemmed Who should care? Exploring the views and experiences of individuals in negotiating solutions for health security
title_sort who should care? exploring the views and experiences of individuals in negotiating solutions for health security
publishDate 2022
url https://repository.ugm.ac.id/284506/1/10-1108_IJSSP-09-2021-0246.pdf
https://repository.ugm.ac.id/284506/
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85121324744&doi=10.1108%2fIJSSP-09-2021-0246&partnerID=40&md5=ce51c59ce71ccf83fa6f934b1c8f1e0b
_version_ 1787137378446475264