PERBEDAAN KEKUATAN FLEKSURAL FIBER REINFORCED COMPOSITE DENGAN STRUKTUR LENO WEAVE DAN LONG LONGITUDINAL POLYETHYLENE PADA GIGI TIRUAN CEKAT ADHESIF
Fiber reinforced composite (FRC) is a material that can be used for fixed partial bridge, this material is a resin base material reinforced by fiber substructure which aims to improve its mechanical properties. Fiber reinforced from FRC consists of a variety of fiber structure, differences in fiber...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
Published: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2011
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://repository.ugm.ac.id/90025/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=52364 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universitas Gadjah Mada |
Summary: | Fiber reinforced composite (FRC) is a material that can be used for fixed
partial bridge, this material is a resin base material reinforced by fiber
substructure which aims to improve its mechanical properties. Fiber reinforced
from FRC consists of a variety of fiber structure, differences in fiber structure can
affect the mechanical strength. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the
difference between the flexural strength of fiber reinforced composite with leno
weave polyethylene and fiber reinforced composite with long longitudinal
structure polyethylene.
The study used 20 subjects FRC plate with a size of 2 x 2 x 25 cm which
is divided into 2 groups. Group I, leno weave polyethylene fiber. Group II, long
longitudinal polyethylene fiber. Both are coated with flowable composite resin on
the bottom and top layer fiber with a high 0.5 mm each and then cured 40
seconds. The top of the flowable composite resin is then given a conventional
composite resin to mold and then cured 40 seconds. Then the subjects was treated
the test flexural strength with a universal testing machine.
From the results showed that there are significant differences between the
flexural strength of FRC with leno weave polyethylene and FRC with long
longitudinal polyethylene (P <0.05) and flexural strength of FRC in the group
with leno weave polyethylene structure is higher than FRC with long longitudinal
polyethylene structure. Conclusion: Flexural strength of FRC with leno weave
polyethylene were higher and significantly different. |
---|