ANALISIS PEREKONOMIAN DAERAH KABUPATEN MANOKWARI TAHUN 1995-2010
This research aims to analyze the growth of GDP and GDP per capita in Manokwari Regency before and after the expansion region, analyze the changes of the sector's contribution to GDP Manokwari Regency, as well as analyze changes renstra before and after the expansion region. The Data used in th...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
| Published: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2012
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://repository.ugm.ac.id/97791/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=53910 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Universitas Gadjah Mada |
| Summary: | This research aims to analyze the growth of GDP and GDP per capita in Manokwari Regency before and after the expansion region, analyze the changes of the sector's contribution to GDP Manokwari Regency, as well as analyze changes renstra before and after the expansion region.
The Data used in this study is secondary data obtained from BPS and Bappeda Regency Manokwari. In observation of this research is divided into two, namely before the expansion region in 1995 up to 2002, and after the expansion region 2003-2010. The analysis tools used are paired sample t-test statistics-test, analysis of the contribution, and the comparative descriptive Analysis.
The analysis showed that the GDP growth before and after the redistrict have a difference was not statistically significant. It can be seen from the value Sig. (2-tailed) greater than 0.05, which means that GDP growth before and after the redistrict did not differ significantly. The results of the analysis also showed that GDP per capita before and after the redistrict have a statistically significant difference. It can be seen from the value Sig. (2-tailed) of less than 0.05, which means that GDP per capita before and after expansion is significantly different. Based on the analysis results can be seen that the contribution of sectors to the GDP before and after the redistrict showed a decline in some sectors such as agriculture, accompanied by increased contributions from other sectors like the service sector. The agricultural sector remains the sector's largest contributor to GDP, but its dominance began to decline, while the construction sector, trade, hotels, and restaurants, the service sector and manufacturing sector began to increase. The strategic plan changes before and after the redistrict is that the regional growth sectors of the economy after the redistrict is broken down again into sub-sectors of investment, cooperatives and UMKM, employment, food security, and empowerment of village communities. |
|---|