EFEKTIFITAS JANGKA WAKTU PENYELESAIAN PERKARA TERHADAP PUTUSAN PERSELISIHAN HUBUNGAN INDUSTRIAL BERDASARKAN SISTEM KETERBUKAAN INFORMASI DI MAHKAMAH AGUNG REPUBLIK INDONESIA DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 25 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG PELAYANAN PUBLIK

• Main Authors: , Muchayat Syah, S.H., , Dr. Sutanto, S.H., M.S.
• Format: Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed
• Published: [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2012
• Subjects: ETD
• Online Access: https://repository.ugm.ac.id/98017/; http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=52963
• Institution: Universitas Gadjah Mada

Supreme Court is judicial institution which authorized to make legal products. But In a certain time, the institution often hit on complicated problems related to its legal products and authorities, especially the ones associated with administrative things. Several policies and regulations have been published concerned with the information service in the court which is used as a guidance for the creation of transparency and accountability in the Supreme Court and the judiciary below it. However, the ultimate goal of the policies and regulations has not achieved perfectly, especially in the settlement of Industrial Relations Disputes. According to the things that have been mentioned above, the main problems of this research are �Does The Act No. 25 of 2009 about Public Service according to the information disclosure sytem in the Suprame Court of Indonesia able to improve the process of Industrial Relations Disputes� settlement in the Supreme Court?� and �Does the existence of the Ad Hoc Judges in the Supreme Court against the decision of Industrial Relations Disputes become the cause of the inhibition of Industrial Relations Disputes� decision?� This study used normative and empirical research methods. It is known from the research that the period of the case�s settlement handled by the Supreme Court is different from the Industrial Relations Disputes Act. The information system which conducted by the Supreme Court through the digitizing process has not been effective, because the human resources has not inadequate yet. The presence of an Industrial Relations Disputes Ad Hoc Judge in the Supreme Court is as Judge who appointed based on the recommendation of the trade unions and employers' organizations. Ad Hoc Judges are in the development of the Supreme Court, but they are unable to supervise the inhibition of case�s settlement in it. So, it can be concluded that there is unsynchronized things in the law making process with the real practice that had happened in the Supreme Court. The delayed of the litigation process in the Supreme Court is caused by the differences of the work period between the regulation made by the Supreme Court and The Act No. 2 of 2004 about The Settlement of Industrial Disputes, free cost-process of case acceleration for the Industrial Relations Disputes� cases below Rp.150.000.000, - (one hundred and fifty million rupiahs), lack of facilities and infrastructures in the Supreme Court, and bad work habit of the employees are the problems that still hamper the validity of The Act No. 25 of 2009 about Public Service.