PENGORGANISASIAN KELOMPOK TANI TERNAK DALAM PENGEMBANGAN PETERNAKAN SAPI BALI DI KECAMATAN PARIGI KABUPATEN MUNA
In the subdistrict of Parigi, Muna, the farmers bred and cared for Baliness cows in traditional ways. They did not use any technological help for the animals food, health, or mating. Besides an unorganized way of selling the animals, lots of good quality male and female animals were also sold. As th...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
Published: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://repository.ugm.ac.id/98447/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=54715 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universitas Gadjah Mada |
Summary: | In the subdistrict of Parigi, Muna, the farmers bred and cared for Baliness cows in
traditional ways. They did not use any technological help for the animals food,
health, or mating. Besides an unorganized way of selling the animals, lots of good
quality male and female animals were also sold. As the part of care, the breeders
allowed the cows to wander as they did not have stalls or fenced in field for the
cows. Therefore, it was vital for the improvement of the breeders� role in order
they could be more independent in finding financing support, planning and
managing their farming. The local government had been striving for these things
for the villagers including the farmers aiding this by forming the farmers group. It
was unfair for the cow farmers group since they could be not involved in decision
making of the farming cases in that village. The breeders group that had been
formed needed to improve its managing system. To achieve it, they needed a good
organization system for the farmers group.
This study uses a method of qualitative and quantitave research. It took place in
Parigi subdistrict, Muna district, interviewing 117 of the breeders which were
included in the breeders group.
The range of applying the democracy principal was about 47.01% to 72.36%. The
range of applying the participating principal was about 59.83% to 68.66%. The
range of applying the endeavour principal was about 52.78% to 66.95%. And, the
range of applying the members differential orientation was about 47.22% to
66.38%. The organizing indicators consisted of jobs distribution, authority
substitutions, and coordination. From the three indicators above, they were in
medium category. The range of jobs distribution was on the skill adjusting and job
types with 69.52% |
---|