PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PEMENANG LELANG SUKARELA DI BALAI LELANG SWASTA PT TRIAGUNG LUMINTU SEMARANG

• Main Authors: , Dody Safitra, , Dwi Haryati, SH., MH.
• Format: Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed
• Published: [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2012
• Subjects: ETD
• Online Access: https://repository.ugm.ac.id/98484/; http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=55429
• Institution: Universitas Gadjah Mada

The recent research is aimed at identifying whether the implementation of voluntary auction in Auction House of PT Triagung Kuminto, Semarang City was compliant with the Legislation issued by Monetary Minister No 93/PMK.06/2010 about the guidance of auction performance. It was also identify the protection given by Auction Office of PT Triagung Lumintu for the auction winner The recent research adopted approach which consisted of empirical and normative research as well as interview method. The data consisted of primary data and was supplemented with the secondary data. The data was analyzed qualitatively and was written descriptively. The result indicated that the implementation of voluntary auction in the Auction House of PT Triagung Lumintu semarang was not fully compliant with the Legislation of the Monetary Minister No 93/PMK.06/2010 in the case of auction treatise generation. Auction treatise was subsequently created to facilitate the validation process of the auction treatise. The auction implementation was preceded by the auction proposal by those who want to do the voluntary auction in the auction office and subsequently verification was conducted using rigid standard and requirement to narrow the opportunity of problem to appear and then followed with the auction implementation and ended with post-auction. The winner obtained the auction deed as a proof of right alteration through auction. The law protection was given in accordance with the article 16 of Monetary Minister Legislation No 93/PMK/06/2010 the seller was responsible for the object validation, the validation document of auction requirements, ,and the ownership document for the winner. In addition, the seller was also responsible for the law suit which emerged in case the deed to the object and the compensation because of the object invalidation. Furthermore, article 16 states that the auction proprietor requires the owner to prepare the statement conveying that he/she is responsible for any dispute about the object in the future.