KINERJA BUMN SEMEN GO PUBLIC PASCA PERUBAHAN STRATEGIC INVESTOR
This study aims to compare the performance of PT Semen Gresik (Persero) Tbk. before (2006-2009) and after (2010) the discharge of strategic investor, Blue Valley Holdings PTE Ltd., a subsidiary of Rajawali Corporation. The performance being compared is the financial performance including the value a...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
Published: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://repository.ugm.ac.id/98853/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=54984 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universitas Gadjah Mada |
Summary: | This study aims to compare the performance of PT Semen Gresik (Persero)
Tbk. before (2006-2009) and after (2010) the discharge of strategic investor, Blue
Valley Holdings PTE Ltd., a subsidiary of Rajawali Corporation. The
performance being compared is the financial performance including the value
added (EVA, MVA, EV, and P/E), profitability (ROIC, EBITDA, and ROE),
liquidity (current ratio), solvability (debt ratio), and efficiency (ACP, inventory
turnover and fixed assets turnover) as well as non-financial performance, which is
the performance of production (production equipment utilization) and marketing
(market share).
The research method in comparing the company performance is carried out
in two perspectives (point of view). First, internally, comparing the performance
of the company during the presence of strategic investor and after the discharge
of the strategic investor. Second, externally, by comparing the company�s
performance with the performance of the cement company�s competitor during the
period of presence of the strategic investor as well as during the period after the
discharge of the strategic investor. The next step is conducting the company's
business environment analysis covering taxation, and its business strategy.
The result shows that the most of the company�s performance measured and
calculated had an increase during the period of presence of the strategic investor.
After the discharge of the strategic investor, most of the company's performance
being measured and calculated had a decrease despite of increased industry
performance. In the growth of the company's profit margin in 2010, almost half is
due to the tax savings resulting from changes in tax regulation. Furthermore, the
company is supposed to implement corporate strategies that separate clearly
between holding company functions with the function of the operating company
after the discharge of the strategic investor. |
---|