PENILAIAN KERENTANAN DAN KAPASITAS MASYARAKAT DALAM MENGHADAPI BAHAYA BANJIR LAHAR DI KECAMATAN SALAM KABUPATEN MAGELANG MENGGUNAKAN METODE SIG PARTISIPATIF
Located in southwestern slope of Merapi Volcano, Salam sub-district is categorized as lahars prone area, since there are four rivers in this area through which lahars flow. The study is aimed to identify the characteristic of lahars and its elements at risk in Salam sub-district. The vulnerability a...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
| Published: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2012
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://repository.ugm.ac.id/98962/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=54854 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Universitas Gadjah Mada |
| Summary: | Located in southwestern slope of Merapi Volcano, Salam sub-district is
categorized as lahars prone area, since there are four rivers in this area through
which lahars flow. The study is aimed to identify the characteristic of lahars and
its elements at risk in Salam sub-district. The vulnerability and coping capacity of
the community were assessed by investigating their perception and their responds
to the lahars. The participatory GIS has also been examined to design policy on
disaster risk reduction by involving their aspiration.
Survey and observation on site methods was used in this research.
Hazard assessment was done using Participatory GIS methods. P-GIS methods
activities conducted through Focus Group Discussions and involves the
participation of respondent, while the community perception was investigated
through intense interview. Quota sampling method was used to select 180
respondents on village based.
The study found that Villages around Kali Putih and Kali Blongkeng i.e.
Jumoyo, Gulon, Seloboro and Sirahan are recognized as more vulnerable area.
Social vulnerability of respondents is mostly classified in to moderate (51.11 % of
respondents) and high level (42.78 % of respondents). All buildings in any type
are categorized as vulnerable elements at risk, depending upon their location. The
experience of the community on coping with lahars event forms good
understanding to the hazard as indicated by their perception and builds high
capacity as shown by their responds to the last lahars event. As one of conclusion,
participatory GIS is proven as effective tool to involve the community in study
area on designing policy for disaster risk reduction. |
|---|