SENI RUPA KONTENPORER DI YOGYAKARTA SEJAK TAHUN 1975 HINGGA TAHUN 2010 : IDENTITAS DAN PERUBAHAN
The study entitled \"Contemporary Art in Yogyakarta From the year 1975 Until 2010: Identity and Change\" motivated by the fact that since 1975 in Yogyakarta emerging paradigm of art work that upholds the spirit of pluralism. The phenomenon of pluralism in the work of art is increasingly se...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
| Published: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2012
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://repository.ugm.ac.id/99040/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=54526 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Universitas Gadjah Mada |
| Summary: | The study entitled \"Contemporary Art in Yogyakarta From the
year 1975 Until 2010: Identity and Change\" motivated by the fact that
since 1975 in Yogyakarta emerging paradigm of art work that upholds
the spirit of pluralism. The phenomenon of pluralism in the work of
art is increasingly seen in the 1990s, along with the inclusion of
works of art from Indonesia to the international forum.
To understand the contemporary art of Yogyakarta is a
necessary part of research with a focus on cultural identity of the
works of contemporary art, and the paradigm shift underlying the
production of works of contemporary art in Yogyakarta especially
those produced from 1975 until 2010.
This research is a type of multidisciplinary research with the main
method of art history, so the procedure begins with the collection of
primary data sources and secondary form of visual and written data.
The next stage is to conduct a critique of the data source to obtain
data that have high credibility. Furthermore, the data that have been
selected and analyzed with semiotic approach hermeneutics. The
results of analysis of written and visual data longer then interpreted
by considering the context or the motives behind the production of
works of art. The next stage is the stage of historiography or writing
the results of research focused on cultural identity that is reflected
from the works of art, and the paradigms underlying the changes in
the manner and form of works of art. The last stage is the explanation
or clarification that is preparing arguments that links between the
work of art with a socio-economic, socio-political, and socio-cultural.
The results showed that cultural identity is reflected in the
works of contemporary art in Yogyakarta include: diaspora and ethnic
identity, gender identity (feminist), the identity of the public (urban
public art), the identity of the media arts (crafts, design, charcoal), the
identity of the body, identity political, and cultural identity of Java.
Paradigm in the production and reception of art has undergone a
change. Artists do not put a new discovery that individual, and
universal, but uses strategies of irony, parody of the work and other
cultures, characterized by relational, dialogical and pluralistic.
The study also found that the contemporary artists of Yogyakarta
lintasdisiplin approach, taking advantage of artisans, and collaborate
with fellow artists or by non-experts in the work of art. The role of
curators, galleries, and collectors is quite important in encouraging
the production of contemporary art. |
|---|