DAMPAK PEMBANGUNAN SEKTOR PERTANIAN TERHADAP PENDAPATAN RUMAH TANGGA DI INDONESIA
Equitable distribution of income can�t created by simply doing the injection on manufacturing sector or service sector, but also must be directed to agricultural sector, because agriculture is believed have the most impact on increasing people�s income, especially those in rural area. In additio...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
Published: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://repository.ugm.ac.id/99187/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=54776 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universitas Gadjah Mada |
Summary: | Equitable distribution of income can�t created by simply doing the
injection on manufacturing sector or service sector, but also must be directed to
agricultural sector, because agriculture is believed have the most impact on
increasing people�s income, especially those in rural area. In addition, agricultural
sector has the highest association with increased production in other sectors, so
development of the agricultural sector provides the greatest impact on value
added. The purpose of this study is to analyze impact of various economic policy
simulations in the agricultural sector to the distribution of income among
household groups. Economic policies that are used in this simulation is the
investment policyand land reform policy.
This study uses SAM (Social Accounting Matrix) and paired t test. By
using multiplier analysis known that the most of global pressure received by
household agricultural entrepreneurs. From the estimation result, although
injection of investment can increase the income of each household but share the
income level of each household does not indicate a change, both before and after
injection. This is also supported by result of paired t test, where in each simulation
significantly accept H0, which means the distribution of household income among
groups before and after the investment is no different. While injection of land
reform can improve and change the share of income from each household. This is
suppoted by result of paired t test, where in each simulation is significantly reject
H0, which means the distribution of household income among groups before and
after the land reform differently. |
---|