ELECTORAL VOLATILITY NASIONAL DAN LOKAL: Studi Tentang Stabilitas Sistem Kepartaian Indonesia Pasca Orde Baru
Electoral conditions after the New Order, 1999, 2004, and 2009 show an instability both at the national and local Kota and Kabupaten Malang. Parties that pass the threshold as PDIP, Golkar, PKB, PPP, PAN, the PBB continue to decline and bring the new party like PKS and the Demokrat (election 2004),...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
Published: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://repository.ugm.ac.id/99464/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=55984 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universitas Gadjah Mada |
Summary: | Electoral conditions after the New Order, 1999, 2004, and 2009 show an
instability both at the national and local Kota and Kabupaten Malang. Parties that pass
the threshold as PDIP, Golkar, PKB, PPP, PAN, the PBB continue to decline and bring
the new party like PKS and the Demokrat (election 2004), Hanura and Gerindra
(elections 2009) entering the system. The purpose of this study seeks to analyze the
high electoral volatility, electoral volatility change and sustainability, as well as the
source of the cause of electoral volatility in both the national and local Kota and
Kabupaten of Malang.
This study only analyzes the dependent variable, namely the national and local
electoral volatility, using a comparative approach. The main element is comparing the
index of electoral volatility either individually (total volatility) and ideological blocks
(block volatility). Calculation of total volatility is based on the Pedersen formula
(1979), while the calculation of block volatility based on a formula Paul Pening et.al.
(2006). In order to support the analysis in this study, the authors use aggregate data of
national and local election results obtained from the General Elections Commission
(KPU). In addition to quantitative data, analysis of this study is also equipped with
qualitative data obtained from the observation, in-depth interviews and focus group
discussion, especially for analysis at the local level.
The findings of this study indicate that electoral volatility post-New Order
Indonesia is high, there is a change and the sustainability of electoral volatility, as well
as any combination of the cause of the sources of electoral volatility in both the
national and local level. The average national electoral volatility of the individual
parties (total volatility) of 29.15% (28.55% for the 2004 election and 29.74% for 2009
election). In terms of ideological blocks (Islam and Nationalist), the average
nationwide block volatility of 6.53% ((2004 election was 2.22% and 2009 election was
10.83%). Conditions electoral volatility is not much different from the national local
Kota and Kabupaten Malang. In terms of individual parties, the average electoral
volatility of Kota and Kabupten Malang (total volatility) of 29.72% and 22.41%. At the
Kota and Kabupaten Malang, the electoral volatility in the 2004 election was 32.27%
and 27.17% while in the 2009 election 19.82% and 27.99%. In terms of ideological
block (Islam and Nationalist), the average of Kota Malang block volatility was 6.47%
with details of 2, 89% (elections 2004) and 10.05% (2009 election), while Kabupaten
Malang was 7.77% with the details 0.51% (election 2004), and 15.03% (elections
2009).
The high electoral volatility post-New Order Indonesia both national and local
level Kota and Kabupaten Malang is caused by a combination of several factors: First,
the national factor consisting of the electoral system, the threshold of votes / seats.
Second, local factors was the declining support for NU and Muhammadiyah, the
movement of popular cadres and party cadres. Third, the party's internal factors
consisting of the conflict parties, the performance of the party. Fourth, the voting
behavior factors like voter pragmatism. |
---|