EVALUASI IMPLEMENTASI TANGGUNG JAWAB SOSIAL PERUSAHAAN Studi pada PT Semen Gresik (Persero) Tbk.
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) recently becomes a concept that need to be conducted by a company to keep the sustain of the business. Although CSR is no longer new thing in Indonesian business environment, there are still many companies which think CSR as philanthropic and society development...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
| Published: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2012
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://repository.ugm.ac.id/99733/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=55839 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Universitas Gadjah Mada |
| Summary: | Corporate social responsibility (CSR) recently becomes a concept that need to be conducted by a company to keep the sustain of the business. Although CSR is no longer new thing in Indonesian business environment, there are still many companies which think CSR as philanthropic and society development actions. Corporate social responsibility should relate with company core business in order to show the society how company obtain the profit in responsible way. The essence of corporate social responsibility based on ISO 26000 is the connection between the company interests towards its stakeholders.
Currently, corporate social responsibility implemented by PT Semen Gresik (Persero) Tbk., already align with the essence of ISO 26000 corporate social responsibility. Furthermore, PT Semen Gresik (Persero) Tbk. corporate social responsibility already starts to move from the responsive corporate social responsibility into strategic corporate social responsibility. The result of PT Semen Gresik (Persero) Tbk. corporate social responsibility performance from qualitative and quantitative point of view which based on some indicators in SRG GRI, showed a success sign in three pillars of corporate social responsibility. But, the positive performance from internal perspective had some differences when the performance was compared with the external perspective, especially with environmental corporate social responsibility. |
|---|