Collaboratively composing an argumentative essay: Wiki versus face-to-face interactions
This study employed a qualitative case study method to compare learner-learner interaction on wiki and face-to-face collaborative writing in completing an argumentative essay. Face-toface collaborative writing refers to in-class meeting of students to write essays collaboratively. Thirty ESL tert...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
2017
|
Online Access: | http://journalarticle.ukm.my/11626/1/13665-52944-2-PB.pdf http://journalarticle.ukm.my/11626/ http://ejournal.ukm.my/gema/issue/view/967 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia |
Language: | English |
Summary: | This study employed a qualitative case study method to compare learner-learner interaction
on wiki and face-to-face collaborative writing in completing an argumentative essay. Face-toface
collaborative writing refers to in-class meeting of students to write essays
collaboratively. Thirty ESL tertiary students from an intact class participated in the study.
They were randomly divided into Group 1 and Group 2. Each of the two groups was further
sub-divided into five smaller groups comprising three members. Group 1 discussed and wrote
the essay on the wiki platform while Group 2 did the same task face-to-face in the classroom.
One sub-group from both modes of writing was selected for in-depth comparison. Data were
collected from the collaborative writing processes on the wiki platform and audio-recordings
of face-to-face interactions, and also from semi-structured interviews. The findings revealed
that the participants of both modes of writing were able to evaluate different viewpoints, and
understand shortcomings and strengths through interaction in either of the collaborative
learning contexts. The collaboration through both modes of writing showed that the
participants not only displayed similar understanding, but also learned from each other
through developing and sharing different perspectives on the same issues. Of the differences
found between the two modes of collaborative writing, Wiki is a more effective platform for
drafting and revising, while planning is easier done through face-to-face interaction. The
study implies that either mode of collaborative writing can be adopted by ESL language
instructors who aspire to practice the social-constructivist approach to writing instruction
especially in a blended learning environment. |
---|