Students’ responses to tutor feedback: focusing on their writing and perceptions

Studies on students’ responses to tutor feedback have been conducted in large scales, in particular, focusing on students’ perceptions of tutor feedback. However, few of these studies have examined how students respond to tutors’ written feedback in their writing. In order to broaden the understa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cho, Sookyung, Park, Chanho
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2019
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/14090/1/30703-108013-1-PB.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/14090/
http://ejournal.ukm.my/gema/issue/view/1212
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
Language: English
id my-ukm.journal.14090
record_format eprints
spelling my-ukm.journal.140902020-01-31T22:46:41Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/14090/ Students’ responses to tutor feedback: focusing on their writing and perceptions Cho, Sookyung Park, Chanho Studies on students’ responses to tutor feedback have been conducted in large scales, in particular, focusing on students’ perceptions of tutor feedback. However, few of these studies have examined how students respond to tutors’ written feedback in their writing. In order to broaden the understanding of a student’s response to a tutor’s feedback, this study examines tutors’ written feedback, students’ writings, and their perceptions of the feedback. Based on this examination, this study aims to see what types of tutor feedback do students incorporate in their revisions and what the students think of tutor feedback. The participants were 11 tutors and 18 college students. Each student received tutor feedback on two writing assignments—a compare-and-contrast essay and an argumentative essay— and filled out a questionnaire that asked about their experiences with the feedback they received. The analysis of students’ writing and tutor feedback reveal that error type and feedback type seem to affect a student’s incorporation of feedback; in particular, students incorporated content-oriented, indirect, and coded types of feedback more than the other feedback types. The questionnaire data show that most students valued the tutor feedback; however, low incorporators had more problems in incorporating tutor feedback. Based on these results, suggestions on tutor feedback and implications for future studies are discussed. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2019-08 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/14090/1/30703-108013-1-PB.pdf Cho, Sookyung and Park, Chanho (2019) Students’ responses to tutor feedback: focusing on their writing and perceptions. GEMA: Online Journal of Language Studies, 19 (3). pp. 75-87. ISSN 1675-8021 http://ejournal.ukm.my/gema/issue/view/1212
institution Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
building Tun Sri Lanang Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
content_source UKM Journal Article Repository
url_provider http://journalarticle.ukm.my/
language English
description Studies on students’ responses to tutor feedback have been conducted in large scales, in particular, focusing on students’ perceptions of tutor feedback. However, few of these studies have examined how students respond to tutors’ written feedback in their writing. In order to broaden the understanding of a student’s response to a tutor’s feedback, this study examines tutors’ written feedback, students’ writings, and their perceptions of the feedback. Based on this examination, this study aims to see what types of tutor feedback do students incorporate in their revisions and what the students think of tutor feedback. The participants were 11 tutors and 18 college students. Each student received tutor feedback on two writing assignments—a compare-and-contrast essay and an argumentative essay— and filled out a questionnaire that asked about their experiences with the feedback they received. The analysis of students’ writing and tutor feedback reveal that error type and feedback type seem to affect a student’s incorporation of feedback; in particular, students incorporated content-oriented, indirect, and coded types of feedback more than the other feedback types. The questionnaire data show that most students valued the tutor feedback; however, low incorporators had more problems in incorporating tutor feedback. Based on these results, suggestions on tutor feedback and implications for future studies are discussed.
format Article
author Cho, Sookyung
Park, Chanho
spellingShingle Cho, Sookyung
Park, Chanho
Students’ responses to tutor feedback: focusing on their writing and perceptions
author_facet Cho, Sookyung
Park, Chanho
author_sort Cho, Sookyung
title Students’ responses to tutor feedback: focusing on their writing and perceptions
title_short Students’ responses to tutor feedback: focusing on their writing and perceptions
title_full Students’ responses to tutor feedback: focusing on their writing and perceptions
title_fullStr Students’ responses to tutor feedback: focusing on their writing and perceptions
title_full_unstemmed Students’ responses to tutor feedback: focusing on their writing and perceptions
title_sort students’ responses to tutor feedback: focusing on their writing and perceptions
publisher Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
publishDate 2019
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/14090/1/30703-108013-1-PB.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/14090/
http://ejournal.ukm.my/gema/issue/view/1212
_version_ 1657565466420314112