The limitations of the right to be heard in disciplinary proceedings against public servants in Malaysia: an infringement of the fundamental liberties under Article 5 and Article 8 of the Federal Constitution

Since 1976, despite the Privy Council’s decision in Najar Singh’s case, the right to be heard particularly on its expansion to the right of oral hearing in disciplinary proceedings against public servants in Malaysia has become an ongoing challenge. This is the outcome of the different approaches...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zukiferee Ibrahim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2020
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/16152/1/41602-145254-1-PB.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/16152/
https://ejournal.ukm.my/juum/issue/view/1365
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
Language: English
id my-ukm.journal.16152
record_format eprints
spelling my-ukm.journal.161522021-02-11T00:41:57Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/16152/ The limitations of the right to be heard in disciplinary proceedings against public servants in Malaysia: an infringement of the fundamental liberties under Article 5 and Article 8 of the Federal Constitution Zukiferee Ibrahim, Since 1976, despite the Privy Council’s decision in Najar Singh’s case, the right to be heard particularly on its expansion to the right of oral hearing in disciplinary proceedings against public servants in Malaysia has become an ongoing challenge. This is the outcome of the different approaches adopted by the courts in determining such right to the affected public servants. This article analysed the constitutional provisions and the judicial review approach with regards to the right to be heard of public servants in disciplinary proceedings as granted in Article 135(2) of the Federal Constitution. This article employed qualitative method by using content analysis. The findings indicated that first, the interpretation of the constitutional term “a reasonable opportunity of being heard” is vague. Next, the judicial review application is inconsistent and finally, the limitation of the right to be heard deprives the life and personal liberty of a person as envisaged in Article 5 and Article 8 of the Federal Constitution. Thus, the constitutional protection of “a reasonable opportunity of being heard” which falls under Article 135(2) in the case of dismissal and reduction of a public servant’s rank in Malaysia should be interpreted in the light of the fundamental liberties as guaranteed in Article 5 and Article 8 of the Federal Constitution. It is proposed that the oral hearing which is an essence to the principle of right to be heard be regulated in the disciplinary proceedings against public servants in Malaysia. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2020 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/16152/1/41602-145254-1-PB.pdf Zukiferee Ibrahim, (2020) The limitations of the right to be heard in disciplinary proceedings against public servants in Malaysia: an infringement of the fundamental liberties under Article 5 and Article 8 of the Federal Constitution. Jurnal Undang-Undang dan Masyarakat, 27 . pp. 83-91. ISSN 1394-7729 https://ejournal.ukm.my/juum/issue/view/1365
institution Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
building Tun Sri Lanang Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
content_source UKM Journal Article Repository
url_provider http://journalarticle.ukm.my/
language English
description Since 1976, despite the Privy Council’s decision in Najar Singh’s case, the right to be heard particularly on its expansion to the right of oral hearing in disciplinary proceedings against public servants in Malaysia has become an ongoing challenge. This is the outcome of the different approaches adopted by the courts in determining such right to the affected public servants. This article analysed the constitutional provisions and the judicial review approach with regards to the right to be heard of public servants in disciplinary proceedings as granted in Article 135(2) of the Federal Constitution. This article employed qualitative method by using content analysis. The findings indicated that first, the interpretation of the constitutional term “a reasonable opportunity of being heard” is vague. Next, the judicial review application is inconsistent and finally, the limitation of the right to be heard deprives the life and personal liberty of a person as envisaged in Article 5 and Article 8 of the Federal Constitution. Thus, the constitutional protection of “a reasonable opportunity of being heard” which falls under Article 135(2) in the case of dismissal and reduction of a public servant’s rank in Malaysia should be interpreted in the light of the fundamental liberties as guaranteed in Article 5 and Article 8 of the Federal Constitution. It is proposed that the oral hearing which is an essence to the principle of right to be heard be regulated in the disciplinary proceedings against public servants in Malaysia.
format Article
author Zukiferee Ibrahim,
spellingShingle Zukiferee Ibrahim,
The limitations of the right to be heard in disciplinary proceedings against public servants in Malaysia: an infringement of the fundamental liberties under Article 5 and Article 8 of the Federal Constitution
author_facet Zukiferee Ibrahim,
author_sort Zukiferee Ibrahim,
title The limitations of the right to be heard in disciplinary proceedings against public servants in Malaysia: an infringement of the fundamental liberties under Article 5 and Article 8 of the Federal Constitution
title_short The limitations of the right to be heard in disciplinary proceedings against public servants in Malaysia: an infringement of the fundamental liberties under Article 5 and Article 8 of the Federal Constitution
title_full The limitations of the right to be heard in disciplinary proceedings against public servants in Malaysia: an infringement of the fundamental liberties under Article 5 and Article 8 of the Federal Constitution
title_fullStr The limitations of the right to be heard in disciplinary proceedings against public servants in Malaysia: an infringement of the fundamental liberties under Article 5 and Article 8 of the Federal Constitution
title_full_unstemmed The limitations of the right to be heard in disciplinary proceedings against public servants in Malaysia: an infringement of the fundamental liberties under Article 5 and Article 8 of the Federal Constitution
title_sort limitations of the right to be heard in disciplinary proceedings against public servants in malaysia: an infringement of the fundamental liberties under article 5 and article 8 of the federal constitution
publisher Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
publishDate 2020
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/16152/1/41602-145254-1-PB.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/16152/
https://ejournal.ukm.my/juum/issue/view/1365
_version_ 1691734022684672000