A forensic study of ethnicity and sex differences in fingerprint patterns in a Malaysian sub-population

Fingerprint is one of the most common evidence found at a crime scene. Owing to the uniqueness of fingerprint, it is useful for suspect identification. Typically, the questioned fingerprint is of limited contribution due to blurriness of the minutia or absence of potential suspect. However, it...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Loong, Chuen Lee, Darrelyn CN, Nurul Syafiqah A
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Pusat Perubatan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2021
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/17440/1/9_ms0455_pdf_97938.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/17440/
https://www.medicineandhealthukm.com/toc/16/1
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
Language: English
id my-ukm.journal.17440
record_format eprints
spelling my-ukm.journal.174402021-09-23T01:53:39Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/17440/ A forensic study of ethnicity and sex differences in fingerprint patterns in a Malaysian sub-population Loong, Chuen Lee Darrelyn CN, Nurul Syafiqah A, Fingerprint is one of the most common evidence found at a crime scene. Owing to the uniqueness of fingerprint, it is useful for suspect identification. Typically, the questioned fingerprint is of limited contribution due to blurriness of the minutia or absence of potential suspect. However, it is still useful if the ethnicity or sex of the questioned fingerprint could be inferred to narrow down the scope of searching of suspect. Therefore, this study aims to examine sexual and ethnic differences in fingerprint patterns among the three major ethnic groups in Malaysia, i.e. Malays, Chinese and Indians. In total, 2000 plain fingerprints were collected from all the ten fingers of 200 Malaysians (i.e. 99 males and 101 females). Each of the three ethnic groups was represented by at least 60 subjects. Descriptive statistics and hypothesis test were performed to assess the sexual and ethnic variability of fingerprint patterns. In addition, simple correspondence analysis was also conducted to support the descriptive and inferential statistics. By considering fingerprint patterns in all the ten fingers, loop was the most frequent pattern in Malays (23.0%) and Indians (23.2%), while Chinese (13.9%) showed slightly higher frequency of whorl than Malays (9.6%) and Indians (10.3%). The relative distribution of fingerprint patterns of male was similar to that of female. In conclusion, fingerprint patterns could be used to infer the ethnicity rather than the sex of a suspect in the Malaysian context. Pusat Perubatan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2021-06 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/17440/1/9_ms0455_pdf_97938.pdf Loong, Chuen Lee and Darrelyn CN, and Nurul Syafiqah A, (2021) A forensic study of ethnicity and sex differences in fingerprint patterns in a Malaysian sub-population. Medicine & Health, 16 (1). pp. 92-107. ISSN 2289-5728 https://www.medicineandhealthukm.com/toc/16/1
institution Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
building Tun Sri Lanang Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
content_source UKM Journal Article Repository
url_provider http://journalarticle.ukm.my/
language English
description Fingerprint is one of the most common evidence found at a crime scene. Owing to the uniqueness of fingerprint, it is useful for suspect identification. Typically, the questioned fingerprint is of limited contribution due to blurriness of the minutia or absence of potential suspect. However, it is still useful if the ethnicity or sex of the questioned fingerprint could be inferred to narrow down the scope of searching of suspect. Therefore, this study aims to examine sexual and ethnic differences in fingerprint patterns among the three major ethnic groups in Malaysia, i.e. Malays, Chinese and Indians. In total, 2000 plain fingerprints were collected from all the ten fingers of 200 Malaysians (i.e. 99 males and 101 females). Each of the three ethnic groups was represented by at least 60 subjects. Descriptive statistics and hypothesis test were performed to assess the sexual and ethnic variability of fingerprint patterns. In addition, simple correspondence analysis was also conducted to support the descriptive and inferential statistics. By considering fingerprint patterns in all the ten fingers, loop was the most frequent pattern in Malays (23.0%) and Indians (23.2%), while Chinese (13.9%) showed slightly higher frequency of whorl than Malays (9.6%) and Indians (10.3%). The relative distribution of fingerprint patterns of male was similar to that of female. In conclusion, fingerprint patterns could be used to infer the ethnicity rather than the sex of a suspect in the Malaysian context.
format Article
author Loong, Chuen Lee
Darrelyn CN,
Nurul Syafiqah A,
spellingShingle Loong, Chuen Lee
Darrelyn CN,
Nurul Syafiqah A,
A forensic study of ethnicity and sex differences in fingerprint patterns in a Malaysian sub-population
author_facet Loong, Chuen Lee
Darrelyn CN,
Nurul Syafiqah A,
author_sort Loong, Chuen Lee
title A forensic study of ethnicity and sex differences in fingerprint patterns in a Malaysian sub-population
title_short A forensic study of ethnicity and sex differences in fingerprint patterns in a Malaysian sub-population
title_full A forensic study of ethnicity and sex differences in fingerprint patterns in a Malaysian sub-population
title_fullStr A forensic study of ethnicity and sex differences in fingerprint patterns in a Malaysian sub-population
title_full_unstemmed A forensic study of ethnicity and sex differences in fingerprint patterns in a Malaysian sub-population
title_sort forensic study of ethnicity and sex differences in fingerprint patterns in a malaysian sub-population
publisher Pusat Perubatan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
publishDate 2021
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/17440/1/9_ms0455_pdf_97938.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/17440/
https://www.medicineandhealthukm.com/toc/16/1
_version_ 1712286241339211776