Over again : a cognitive account of its meaning transference in the light of an image-schema based model
This article is the second in a two-article series that first critiques polysemic and monosemic theories to the meaning transference of over and then accounts for the word’s meaning transference from an image-schema based model. To be specific, this qualitative study aims to explain the processes...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
2022
|
| Online Access: | http://journalarticle.ukm.my/19918/1/48834-184408-1-PB.pdf http://journalarticle.ukm.my/19918/ https://ejournal.ukm.my/gema/issue/view/1518 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia |
| Language: | English |
| Summary: | This article is the second in a two-article series that first critiques polysemic and monosemic
theories to the meaning transference of over and then accounts for the word’s meaning transference
from an image-schema based model. To be specific, this qualitative study aims to explain the
processes of over’s meaning transference from spatial to non-spatial ones with 1350 instances in
the 2017 Corpus of Contemporary American English, genre: Fiction. In the light of a combination
of Multimodal Image Theory and Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory, the mappings from
SPACE domain to non-spatial domains, image-schema transformations, and a range of conceptual
metaphors associated with over were systematically analysed to first identify the word’s senses
and then account for the mechanisms of its meaning transference. It was found that mappings
together with image-schema transformations are significant in motivating the meaning
transference processes. The results of the study are summarized as follows: (i) The prototypical
sense of over, represented by a pair of image complexes, designates the relative UP spatial
positions and potential forces between the Trajectory (TR) and Landmark (LM) denoted by the
preposition; (ii) its spatial senses cognitively generate within three spatial modalities of thought:
Visual space, Maneuver space, and Kinetic space, and (iii) its non-spatial senses are attached to a
range of conceptual metaphors which are spatially grounded. In other words, three spaces provide
concrete image-schemas or experience which are virtually represented/ mapped on to abstract
experience shown by the retaining salient TR-LM configurations. |
|---|