The scarlet letter and postmodernism

Postmodernism is a convoluted and nebulous term to define as it involves a plethora of major and minor details that appear in a wide variety of areas of study like art, literature, culture architecture, technology, education. Equally problematical is to locate it historically as well as temporally....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Asim Karim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Pusat Pengajian Bahasa dan Linguistik, FSSK, UKM 2013
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/6588/1/3194-9616-1-PB.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/6588/
http://ejournal.ukm.my/3l/issue/archive
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
Language: English
id my-ukm.journal.6588
record_format eprints
spelling my-ukm.journal.65882016-12-14T06:41:37Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/6588/ The scarlet letter and postmodernism Asim Karim, Postmodernism is a convoluted and nebulous term to define as it involves a plethora of major and minor details that appear in a wide variety of areas of study like art, literature, culture architecture, technology, education. Equally problematical is to locate it historically as well as temporally. One of the principal areas of post modernism that continues to inspire critical debate is its strong scepticism of the grand narratives of modernism. Contrary to the modernist focus on hierarchical grand positions, post modernism as Lyotard envisioned it “preaches an appreciation and respect for diversity, for local differences, for the plurality of ways in which human choose to live”. This study aims to analyse Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter as a postmodern text for it demonstrates a strong disinclination to uphold logocentric, monologic, absolute, universalist and structured metanarratives. It will be argued that a strong and hierarchical power structure supports and uphold these metanarratives for specific objectives of perpetuation of the governance and authority over the people. Thus, it links Lyotard’s scepticism of metanarratives with Foucault’s discourse of knowledge and power. It will be argued that resistance and opposition to this phenomenon is pre-eminently demonstrated not only by the most marginalized Hester Prynne, but also by Arthur Dimmesdale who has been one of the beneficiaries of these metanarratives. In countering and opposing the metanarratives, both establish a space for the legitimization of pluralism, diversity and heterogeneity as well as post modern liberation from the totalitarian persecution of the marginalized and the dissident voices. Pusat Pengajian Bahasa dan Linguistik, FSSK, UKM 2013 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/6588/1/3194-9616-1-PB.pdf Asim Karim, (2013) The scarlet letter and postmodernism. 3L; Language,Linguistics and Literature,The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies., 19 (3). pp. 115-125. ISSN 0128-5157 http://ejournal.ukm.my/3l/issue/archive
institution Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
building Perpustakaan Tun Sri Lanang Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
content_source UKM Journal Article Repository
url_provider http://journalarticle.ukm.my/
language English
description Postmodernism is a convoluted and nebulous term to define as it involves a plethora of major and minor details that appear in a wide variety of areas of study like art, literature, culture architecture, technology, education. Equally problematical is to locate it historically as well as temporally. One of the principal areas of post modernism that continues to inspire critical debate is its strong scepticism of the grand narratives of modernism. Contrary to the modernist focus on hierarchical grand positions, post modernism as Lyotard envisioned it “preaches an appreciation and respect for diversity, for local differences, for the plurality of ways in which human choose to live”. This study aims to analyse Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter as a postmodern text for it demonstrates a strong disinclination to uphold logocentric, monologic, absolute, universalist and structured metanarratives. It will be argued that a strong and hierarchical power structure supports and uphold these metanarratives for specific objectives of perpetuation of the governance and authority over the people. Thus, it links Lyotard’s scepticism of metanarratives with Foucault’s discourse of knowledge and power. It will be argued that resistance and opposition to this phenomenon is pre-eminently demonstrated not only by the most marginalized Hester Prynne, but also by Arthur Dimmesdale who has been one of the beneficiaries of these metanarratives. In countering and opposing the metanarratives, both establish a space for the legitimization of pluralism, diversity and heterogeneity as well as post modern liberation from the totalitarian persecution of the marginalized and the dissident voices.
format Article
author Asim Karim,
spellingShingle Asim Karim,
The scarlet letter and postmodernism
author_facet Asim Karim,
author_sort Asim Karim,
title The scarlet letter and postmodernism
title_short The scarlet letter and postmodernism
title_full The scarlet letter and postmodernism
title_fullStr The scarlet letter and postmodernism
title_full_unstemmed The scarlet letter and postmodernism
title_sort scarlet letter and postmodernism
publisher Pusat Pengajian Bahasa dan Linguistik, FSSK, UKM
publishDate 2013
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/6588/1/3194-9616-1-PB.pdf
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/6588/
http://ejournal.ukm.my/3l/issue/archive
_version_ 1643736821799059456